“So now they’re against ICE! You know what ICE is? I’ll tell you what it is, in case all the liberal pukes out there who can’t wait to call in to tell me how smart they are. Well, they’re wrong! It doesn’t mean what they think it means. I’ll tell you what it means. It stands for Ice Cream Enthusiasts. That’s right, all you liberal morons! Spell it out: Ice… Cream… Enthusiasts. It’s all the people in America who love ice cream. That’s right, ice cream. The radical left aren’t satisfied with eliminating detention centers. Now they want to ban ice cream and those who enjoy it. Ice cream for God sake! Can you believe it? What’s wrong with these people, these radical socialists, these communist Democrats?! It’s the insanity of the radical left I tell you! That’s what it is. They’re insane. They hate everything that America stands for: freedom, apple pie, the flag, the national anthem, the right to trash that flag hating, Nike shoe wearing little pansy, Colin Kaepernick, and the liberal media. Will they ban all of those next? The answer is a big, fat yes! I knew this day was coming ladies and gentlemen.
“There are two things we can do with these radical leftist Democrats who want to ban ice cream. We can round them all up and ship them off to Cuba, where they’ll be very happy living in a socialist economy, or we can ship them off to Venezuela where they can riot in the streets till their hearts are content. Nobody is touching my ice cream, God damn it! Hear that all you liberal morons? Hear that, Colin Kaepernick? There’s another idiotic cause you can kneel for, depriving Americans of their ice cream, because apparently it’s now as racist as these detention centers. Venezuela! Venezuela! Venezuela! That’s right, I said it! Tell me I’m wrong!”
When told by his producer that the radical left was actually proposing eliminating ICE, Immigration And Customs Enforcement, Levin expressed relief and replied that he hadn’t eaten lunch yet, and that his mother had packed a pint of Chunky Monkey, his favorite.
“The depraved national media has done a great disservice to David Hogg and to the American people.”
On February 14, 2018, Nikolas Cruz walked into Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland Florida armed with a semi automatic rifle, killing seventeen and injuring many others.
In the after math of the massacre, the student survivors rallied to start a grass roots movement to petition for stricter gun laws – an assault weapons ban, a ban of high capacity magazines, and universal background checks – which included the formation of Never Again MSD, and the nation wide March For Our Lives rallies.
As a result, a number of states passed a number of minor gun control laws. Florida passed the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act.
The NRA and the pro gun media didn’t take kindly to traumatized teenagers who had survived a shooting in their school, saying enough is enough. Nor did they like the fact that these teenagers were intelligent enough to organize a protest movement virtually without help from adults. But what bothered them most of all – especially the NRA – was that these no nothing little brats didn’t kowtow to the absolute authority and greatness of the NRA. It absolutely stuck in their craw. Instead of bowing in subservience to the NRA like our cowardly politicians, our federal law makers ( the majority of them Republicans ) do on a daily basis, they gave the NRA the middle finger, because they understood they are corrupt, and bribe congress not to pass any gun control legislation.
It stuck in their craw that people were angry at the NRA, and rightly so, so they sent their mouth piece Dana Loesch to parrot their talking points and deflect blame for the tragedy onto sheriff Scott Israel, instead of looking at Americas lax gun laws. And after the town hall, Loesch appeared on Fox News to whine about how the town hall had been staged just to inflame emotions – despite the fact that emotions had already been inflamed by the shooting – to make her and the NRA look bad – she did a great job of that herself without help from anyone – and how she, the NRA, and law abiding gun owners were the real victims, a false talking point pro gun conservatives continuously trot out whenever the NRA receives any criticism for its extreme pro gun policies. Fox News, Breitbart, Newsmax, Right-Wing News, Redstate, Town Hall, World Net Daily, all heroically came to Loesch’s rescue, echoing her complaints about how unfairly she had been treated by the depraved, biased media. Give me a f**king break. Cry me a f**king river.
Which brings me to the linked article. He believes it was the depraved so called liberal media that was abusing David Hogg because they allowed him to speak untruths about the NRA and Dana Loesch, both of whom shall forever remain blameless:
“The NRA is blameless. The blame lies solely with the shooter and law enforcement, from the federal level to sheriff Scott Israel’s department, to protect the children. But the students who point that out ( Kashuv ) only get airtime on Fox News, while the other cable networks promote Hogg as he continues to say things that are just plain wrong.“
Like the fact that the NRA and our politicians share a responsibility in this tragedy? Yeah, that’s totally wrong. It’s really those god damned teenagers that want to confiscate everyone’s guns, and do away with the precious second amendment. That’s the problem they should have been focusing on, not the fact that seventeen people had just been murdered with a semi automatic.
Not only is the shooter to blame, but the local sheriff’s department, and the FBI. The only parties that are blameless, are the NRA, and our state and federal law makers. How convenient. The NRA buys politicians to do their bidding, which is to have a pro gun, anti gun control agenda, but they share no responsibility in this tragedy.
I’m surprised he didn’t find an excuse to blame Obama for the shooting, like they blamed him for every shooting when he was president.
Less than a week after the shooting, Florida law makers couldn’t bring themselves to a discussion of an assault weapons ban, much less pass one. Instead, they chose to condemn pornography as a public health hazard! That’s how f**ked up these a**holes and their priorities are, and it demonstrates their willingness to allow the NRA to lead them around by the genitals at the expense of the lives of others.
“News anchors do not correct him. They don’t challenge his untruths. The media has turned Hogg into a spectacle, parading his activist statements in prime time and giving him a platform to spread immature and unserious attacks against those who stand against gun control. The media is wielding his tongue as a sword and his suffering as a shield to advance its narrative and deflect criticism. In doing so, they are teaching him that his attacks are good and right and are encouraging him.”
Twenty children were slaughtered at Sandy Hook Elementary. Fifty eight at a concert in Las Vegas. Seventeen at Marjory Stoneman High School. If you’re someone who denies the reality of gun violence; if you’re someone who believes America has too many gun laws ( insanely weak laws by the way, that allow anyone to have a gun ); if you believe standing against gun control is a noble cause; if you’re someone who gets their f**king jollies off at smearing traumatized kids; if you’re more concerned about your feelings than those who were traumatized in a school shooting, then you’re part of problem, not the solution. You’re likely not interested in a solution. So, shut the fuck up, and sit the f**k down. Let the children speak, the children, in this case, who actually know what they’re talking about, have reasonable demands, most of them supported by a great majority of Americans, and are acting more mature than the Dana Loesch’s, SpongeTed Squishy Pants, and their gun loving groupies.
He’s upset that Hogg and the other student activists are speaking out about gun violence, and didn’t bend the knee to the almighty NRA; that gun control and those who advocate for it are bad people, while those who oppose it are noble heroes fighting a noble cause.
The great irony here is that he decries the alleged immaturity of Hogg’s criticisms as untruths. But he has nothing to say about the actual immaturity of the actual lies and attacks directed at them from conspiracy minded wack job conservatives, who were encouraged in their attacks from the likes of Alex Jones, The Gateway Pundit, World Net Daily, and from the mainstream right-wing media, like Fox News. How the students were co opted by left-wing socialists, funded by Soros, were gun grabbing Nazis, mushy brained and soulless, civil terrorists for criticizing the NRA, and wanting to murder law abiding gun owners , even as they themselves were threaten with death from unhinged gun extremists on social media.
To many pro gun nuts this kind of behavior is acceptable, is not depraved. Nor, it would seem, are death threats against kids who ask for gun control. In their minds, what is depraved, is wanting gun control, and criticizing the NRA, which, apparently is taboo.
Trump ordering secret service to remove Jim Acosta from press conference
President Trump has signed an executive order to arm the unborn!
In a press conference in the Rose Garden, the president told news reporters, “I have just signed an executive order that authorizes anyone involved in the decision to provide an abortion, to refuse according to their religious or personal beliefs that an abortion is wrong. It also gives arms and weapons manufacturers, Smith And Wesson, Lockheed, Winchester, and others, full authority to assist in the making of specialized weaponry for the purpose of arming the unborn.
“The presidential executive order grants Doctors, nurses, patient and family advisors, full authority to refuse in assisting or taking part in the act of providing an abortion based on religious or personal beliefs that life is sacred. It also grants the unborn full protective status as human beings, as it is outlined in the fourteenth amendment. And as protected citizens, they have the right to arm themselves and shoot the Democrats when they come to pull them from their mother’s wombs.
“Like many Americans, I believe that life begins at reception. Even before you have that first cigarette, there’s another person in the room and you better be careful not to talk about aborting little Timmy, or Sally, because you might hurt their feelings. We need to start treating the unborn like everyone else. That means they should have the right to defend themselves in the event that their precious little lives are threatened baby hungry Democrats who want to eat them for breakfast, instead of having a pop tart or a bowl of Fruity Pebbles or something, and what better way to do that than giving them Uzis and AK-47s? If they had Uzis and AK-47s, the baby hungry Democrats would not be able to eat them, and sell their baby body parts, because, let’s be honest here, what do you do when someone is invading your home, your private property?”
“You shoot them!” Someone shouted from the crowd, eliciting nervous laughter.
“That’s right, ” the president said. “You shoot them. And then you ask them why they broke into your house. If it’s a Mexican, chances are he’s an illegal immigrant, and most likely he would be there to rob you, rape you, kill you, and then steal your job. Chances are it’s all four. If it’s a homosexual, chances are he’s there to convert you, and if you refuse because you’re a conservative, he’ll probably call you a homophobe just because you don’t like gay marriage and want to get rid of it. If it’s a gun grabbing liberal, chances are he’s there to steal your guns like Obama did. If it’s a trans gender, chances are he’s there to use you’re bathroom , and if you tell him – or her, or whatever – no, he’ll call you a transphobe, or whatever made up word they’ve labeled people who don’t believe transsexuals are a thing, and then, for good measure, he’ll probably rob you and then use your bathroom.
“We have the right to protect our property and ourselves with a gun if we choose. When someone invades our privacy, when someone breaks into our home, we have the right to shoot them. It’s in the Bible, and it’s in the constitution. Well, I believe the unborn should have those same rights, because the womb is their home until they’re born, so they have a right to defend it from crazy Democrats who would rather eat babies for breakfast than have a bowl of Wheaties or something. These are deplorable people, the Democrats. They’ve been eating Coco Puffs their entire lives and now they want to eat babies. They were cuckoo for regular Coco Puffs. Now they’re cuckoo for Baby Flavored Coco Puffs.”
CNN correspondent Jim Acosta was the first to raise his hand. President Trump pointed at him reluctantly.
“Don’t get crazy on me, Jim, or I’ll have you tossed out on your can.”
There was scatter nervous laughter.
“Yes, sir. First of all, I’m at a complete loss for words. I believe I speak for most of us here when I say that. Everything you said makes absolutely no sense.”
“Well, it’s impossible to arm the unborn with weapons, ” Acosta said. “This sounds like something someone smoking a questionable substance would say. Or a crackpot who’s been listening to too much Alex Jones. Are you a crackpot, Mr. President?”
“No, I assure you I’m not a crackpot, nor have I been listening to Alex Jones.”
“But you’ve appeared on his show several times prior to becoming president, sir.”
“No, I haven’t. That’s fake news. Get him out of here. You’re fake news. CNN is fake news.”
Two secret service men escorted Acosta out the garden as the president continued:
“It is possible to arm the unborn, and we will arm them with specialized miniature guns just in case they need to protect themselves from baby hungry Democrats who want to eat them instead of having a bowl of Fruit Loops, or Coco Puffs, which they should be eating, instead of babies. We will provide them with Uzis, hand guns, AR-15s, machine guns, bullet proof vests, hand grenades, sub machine guns, rocket launchers, and yes, even nuclear weapons, and then baby hungry Democrats will think twice about having a bowl of Baby Coco Puffs for breakfast.”
Rising conservative star, Allie Stuckey – whom virtually no one has heard of – was chosen as the new chairwoman of the Young Women’s Diaper Training Leadership Summit, at this year’s CPAC this past March.
Stuckey, 26, is the host of Blaze TV’s Relatable, a podcast show that blends news, culture, and politics with a right wing perspective, because it’s a fact written in stone, that the liberal media is just too biased and discriminates unfairly against conservatives who can never get a fair shake, despite the fact that conservative voices dominate the news media, print, and radio.
When not producing videos for Blaze TV, the conservative pundit can be found traveling the university circuit whining about liberal intolerance on college campuses, never bothering to mention the fact that the universities where TPUSA has influence, regularly target liberal instructors for harassment by placing them on watch lists, which in some cases may include their personal information.
Shortly after that she started the blog The Conservative Millennial, which was later changed to The Conservative Diaper Wearing Millennial on the advise of close friend Charlie Kirk. Kirk was responsible for spear heading the infamous and disastrous 2017 Kent State diaper wearing fiasco that attempted to portray college liberals as the real snowflakes, but had the opposite reaction, virtually destroying the conservative group’s reputation. Kirk convinced Stucky that the best way to own smug liberals is to wear diapers.
“At first I thought Charlie was out of his mind,” the conservative diaper wearing millennial told The Journal. “The libs were laughing at him and making so much fun of him that I felt bad for him, and I thought no way! I want no part of this! But then after the ridicule began to wear off, and he continued to wear diapers, refusing to let them intimidate him, I thought, hmmm, he might be onto something here. I mean, the whole protest was to show that liberals are the real babies anyway, right? So, what better way to prove it than by wearing diapers. Eventually they would see it our way, that liberals are the diaper wearing babies, not conservatives. Some of my friends and colleagues think that I’m proving just the opposite, but I’m convinced that Charlie is right. If we continue wearing diapers long enough, people will eventually come to see that it’s liberals who are the real snowflakes. We may literally wear diapers, but it’s really metaphorical. So I changed the name of my blog, and decided that I would become a lifetime, diaper wearing member of TPUSA. And I’m thrilled and honored to be chosen as chairwoman of The Young Women’s Diaper Wearing Leadership Committee. I can’t wait to get out there and tell, and show, conservatives that the best way to own the libs is by wearing a great pair of diapers, and I owe it all to Charlie. Thanks Charlie!”
These days, in addition to whining about liberal intolerance, Stuckey speaks to college millennials on the importance of wearing diapers to own the smug libs. So far the tour has been successful. The chapter has well over five thousand diaper wearing converts on an estimated four hundred campuses nation wide.
“Allie is such an inspiration, not only to conservative women, but diaper wearing conservative millennials all over America, ” Charlie Kirk said. “And she’s my personal hero. She’s proving to conservatives that she’s dedicated to fighting liberal bias and intolerance on college campuses, and she’s not afraid to wear diapers to do it.”
Stuckey says she was so inspired by Charlie Kirk’s book , Wear A Diaper, Own A Lib, that she is in the process of writing a book of her own on the subject, which will be released next Spring, titled My Experiences As A Conservative Diaper Wearing Millennial. She is also working on a second book with Charlie Kirk, How I Became A Conservative Diaper Wearing Millennial For TPUSA.
The myth of the liberal media has been pushed by conservative media figures for decades with no evidence. Actually the media is dominated by right-wing conservative voices that push a conservative agenda. Even right-wing talk radio has for decades, dominated the air waves.
There are three types of media bias. Sensational, establishment, and neutrality bias. CNN and MSNBC engage in all three biases. Fox is pure right-wing establishment bias. CNN’s guilt is not that it’s liberal, but that it constantly engages in neutrality bias, taking both sides of news stories that are important to a vast majority of Americans. For instance, whenever they do a news story on Global warming ( which is rare ), or gun violence, instead of objectively reporting the issues, they always go out of their way to present both sides, facts be damned, as though opinions and personal feelings are just as important as facts. They’re not. If CNN were liberal, or progressive, it would objectively report the facts on Climate Change, gun violence, health care, the Green New Deal, or any issue that is important to progressives and liberals, instead of engaging in false equivalency. Their anchors supported the Iraq war, and praised Trump’s bombing of Syria just months after he took the White House, and have featured more negative coverage of Bernie Sanders in favor of the establishment favorite, Hilary Clinton. CNN gladly bends over backwards to allow conservatives to rat f**k them, because they’re terrified of being called liberal or progressive, and still right-wingers bitch and moan about how biased they are against conservatives. F**king hilarious!
Last year, the conservative media giant, Sinclaire Broadcast Group, owned by the Sinclair family, which in turn owns nearly two hundred local affiliated news stations across the country, required local news broadcasters to air the exact same scripted message about media bias and fake news :
I’m extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism that we produce. But I’m concerned about the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country. The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming, national media outlets are publishing the same fake stories without checking facts first. Unfortunately, some members of national media are using their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control ‘exactly what people think.’ This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. We understand that Truth is neither left nor right. Our commitment to factual reporting is the foundation of our credibility, now more than ever.
The promo is nothing but pure right-wing projection, propaganda. Here you have a right-wing media broadcast empire – which apparently made a 2016 deal with the Trump campaign to do positive news coverage on Trump – requiring its local broadcasters to criticize the media as fake news, while they themselves are engaging in fake news and right-wing propaganda. Talk about media bias.
Right-wing media has done nothing but push fake news stories for years. Fox News did stories on birtherism, the belief that Obama’s birth certificate is fake, bashed him for wearing a tan suit, putting mustard on a hamburger, pushed conspiracy theories about how he deliberately allowed Americans to die in Benghazi, death panels in the ACA, the Seth Rich murder, Charlottesville was a left-wing Antifa conspiracy to delegitimize Trump.
So, the claim that the media is unfairly biased against conservatives, is ridiculous. However, there is plenty of evidence to show that there is a right-wing, and an establishment bias against progressives. But conservatives continue to push the myth of a liberal media.
Right – wingers are always whining about liberal intolerance. If you’re a liberal who believes that every human being deserves respect and dignity despite their race, religion, or sexual orientation, and refuse to buy into the right-wing myths and stereotypes about gays, trans genders, immigrants, and Muslims, then you’re the intolerant one. If you dare criticize their hateful and bigoted tirades and rants, then it’s you and all of liberalism that is intolerant and want to silence conservative thought and opinion. Which is nonsense.
Right-wing extremists like Dana Loesch, who accuse liberals of intolerance, engage in it themselves on a daily basis. An example of the intolerance that the right-wing has for opposing ideas, views and opinions, was their media assault on the teenage survivors of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Right-wing media ( including the NRA ) employed an extensive harassment and smear campaign to discredit and smear them because they had the balls to stand up to the NRA and the politicians they bribe, and say enough is enough, do something. They were accused of being crises actors; paid shills of George Soros, and leftist gun-grabbing Marxists groups; soulless and mushy brained ( that would be people like Loesch, and Squishy Pants Nugent ); they were civil terrorists; were compared to Nazis who wanted to ban guns; and wanted to murder law abiding gun owners. And not to mention, the countless death threats they’ve endured. This is actual intolerance. Conservatives, whose feelings are so fragile they are incapable of hearing an opposing point of view – in this case, teenagers calling for a strengthening of America’s lax gun laws – without completely losing it, and throwing temper tantrums like petulant children who can’t get their way. And they claim it’s really liberals who are the crybabies.
Gun reform activists are all fair game for right-wing criticism. When David Hogg said at the MFOL rally, “I’m going to put this price tag right here as a reminder how much money Marco Rubio took from the NRA for every students lives in Florida,” right-wing gun nuts, and the NRA, lost their minds. David French of the National Review, tweeted : “So, the adult activists think this kind of rhetoric is acceptable?” He had no such rebuke for fellow conservative Kevin Williamson when he called for the death penalty of women who have abortions. In fact, he wrote an article titled, The Sliming Of Kevin Williamson, praising him , and asking liberals to be tolerant. Conservatives want liberals to be tolerant, but apparently they don’t care to hold themselves to the same standard.
Likewise, he has had no rebuke for Dana Loesch’s violent rhetoric when she attacks the free press, and calls for the curb stomping of perceived liberal reporters and calls them the rat bastards of the earth, her NRA videos depicting liberal protesters as fascists for protesting, or some of her inflammatory CPAC speeches where she has used racially charged language to accuse the media of loving mass shootings. If anyone loves mass shootings, it’s certainly Dana Loesch, Wayne Lapew, and her other fascist cohorts at the NRA. Firearm sales rise after mass shootings, which pleases the manufacturers, which means more gun sales for the NRA, and more money in their pockets.
Conservatives like Loesch expect liberals to just shut up and accept anything they say about liberals and progressives, without criticism, no matter how insane it is. She and other conservatives can accuse liberals and Democrats of supporting infanticide. We must accept that insane accusation, and shut the f**k up, and if we dare criticize her, then we’re being intolerant. She proclaimed it, so it must be true, since she is just one of several harbingers of truth in a ‘dishonest liberal media’. And yet, if liberals or progressives dare accuse her, and the NRA of allowing children to be shot, for bribing politicians to ignore gun violence, and its failure to support universal background checks, then it’s a false attack against not only her and the NRA, but a vicious smear campaign to besmirch their flawless and wonderful reputations, and silence her and her fellow conservatives.
Let’s all cry a river for Dana and the honest media she represents. They’re such victims.
Speaking of which political party or movement that only cares about the constitution when it suites their purposes, it would be the Republican party and its conservative base, especially the radical, gun nut extremists like Dana Loesch who believe that the second amendment guarantees the American citizen the almighty God given right to own an arsenal of weapons ( it doesn’t ), let alone a single gun.
And how are liberals censoring conservative media outlets? Liberals have no interest in censoring conservatives. Conservative news sources like Fox News, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Wire, and conservatives like Loesch, and some of the biggest names in conservativism like Glenn Beck, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Steven Crowder – and anyone else claiming they’ve been censored from social media just because they’re conservative – are thriving on social media, like Facebook, and YouTube. The only so-called conservative outlets that I’m aware of that had been banned from certain social media platforms, were lunatics like Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Laura Loomer ( some of which have been reinstated ). And what does this have to do with big government liberal schemes? Absolutely nothing. It’s not a first amendment issue. Social media like Facebook and YouTube are private enterprises that have every right to ban content creators who violate policy guide lines involving hate speech. So, conservatives who claim they’ve been targeted solely for their conservative views, are just being disingenuous. Claiming censorship is a tool to work the sympathies of the gullible who buy their propaganda ( which includes all forms of bigotry ) as truth.
On the other hand, those who would not hesitate to censor their critics, are right wingers. For example, conservatives like Dana Loesch with her totally asinine NRA videos attacking liberals who protest the president’s behavior, and her attacks against journalists she deems to be liberal, whom she has called to be curb stomped because they dare criticize a Republican president. She constantly bemoans the legitimate media as lying, dishonest liberal hacks, while totally and conveniently overlooking the media she should be focusing her scorn and criticism on. But since she’s a member of that media, no amount of criticism will be forth coming, therefore exposing herself as a shameless, and hypocritical partisan hack.
It’s clear that Dana considers herself and her colleagues in right-wing media as troublesome truth-tellers to a supposed liberal media elite. Which is too hilarious to even consider. Loesch is a disingenuous hack who wouldn’t know what actual truth is if it rose up and bit her in the a**.
If there is anyone as dim witted as the president, it’s his oldest son, Don Jr.. Like father, like son.
In a story published last year in a CNN article, Donald Trump Jr. made the moronic claim that proved he is just as dumb, or dumber than his old man.
While at the premiere of Dinesh D’Souza’s Death Of A Nation, he told One America News Now that leftists were unfairly accusing the right of acting like fascists. “When you look at the actual history of how these things evolved – and you actually look at that platform versus the platform of the modern left – you say, ‘wait a minute, those two are heavily aligned, and frankly, contrary to the right.”
When Politfact ripped him a new pie hole for being a total moron, he claimed he was stating facts. Facts, that is according to Dinesh D’Souza’s version of history, which is anything that doesn’t fit the conservative, right wing narrative, is liberal bias.
From a Johnathan Chait article in The Intelligencer, on the same subject: “If today’s Democrats are the modern equivalent of the pro-slavery Democrats, why are they trying to take down confederate statues, while conservatives like Trump defend them?”
Here’s my question : And if Democrats are the real Nazis, why is it that the GOP had actual Nazis and white supremacists running for office during the primaries and the mid terms?
Also from Jonathan Chait in the same article : “Calling modern liberals the real Nazis and neo-Confederates, was a fun troll for the right-wing. You can’t troll your opponents as Nazis when there are actual Nazis marching for you.”
“Even though the GOP has employed the southern strategy, and had actual Nazis and white supremacists running for office in the primaries and mid terms, Democrats are the real racists and Nazis!”