For decades conservatives have been victimized by anti conservative bias in the media. From college campuses, the news, to social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and search engines like Google and Bing, are all in the business of suppressing conservative opinion and thought. Only on Fox News, and outlets like Blaze TV, Breitbart, Right Wing News, World Net Daily, and American Thinker, can you find unbiased, objective truth.
Ever since President Trump was elected, the lame stream leftist media has done everything possible to destroy his good name and his presidency, simply because they hate him. No other president in human history has ever been treated as badly, not even that black guy, whose name escapes me at the moment. He may have been a radical, America hating, white hating, gun-grabbing, Marxist Muslim who wasn’t eligible to be president, but at least he was never treated as badly as Trump is, and that’s a fact, Jack.
It’s amusing that conservatives in the media live in their glass houses, while throwing stones at others. They criticize other media outlets and individuals as liberally biased when they are anything but, pretending that they themselvesare not a part of that media, as if they are exempt from any criticism, as if they are the only sources of objectivity and truth.
On a recent episode of the View, they were discussing the alleged Ukraine scandal with Guest Rachel Maddow, when Abby Huntsman asked her if she might be part of the problem why some people may not believe that Trump is guilty in connection to the scandal.
“There has been a crying wolf for so long. This is it, this is the smoking gun, he’s out, for two years now from Democrats, from some members of the media – that now you have people in this country that are like, ‘We don’t believe anything anymore.’ They’re shutting it off, they are not taking it as seriously as they should, and I ask you, do you think you’re part of that problem?”
Was the media guilty of exaggerated reporting regarding the alleged collusion between Trump and Russia? Certainly. I don’t dispute that. But even if Trump had colluded with Russia, right wing media would be defending him, just as they’re now defending him on his scandal with Ukraine.
Huntsman added that as someone who was also in the media, she shared some of the blame. Yes, she certainly does. As a serious journalist for Fox News, Huntsman – and pretty much every commentator at the network – was guilty of allowing conservative guests and contributors to spread falsehoods about Obama’s alleged hatred and war on law enforcement, and defending Trump when he failed to fully condemn the Charlottesville marchers. She had this to say during a segment on Fox And Friends:
“I knew when he didn’t call it for what it was – a lot of people, a lot of people thought he should, many members of the Republican party as well – I knew exactly the direction the media and the Democrats would take it, because it fits into the narrative that many of them had the whole time he’s been president, that he supports these types of groups, and that is problematic for society.”
Right wing media pundits are guilty of a lot more than the so called liberal media they love to condemn as biased and dishonest. According to Media Matters, Huntsman had her own problems when it came to honesty while employed at the network. From the moment the Benghazi consulate was attacked by Islamic militants, Fox News and the right wing echo chamber – with no evidence – cried wolf. They took an unfortunate tragedy and spun it into a national scandal bigger than Watergate. They accused Obama – who was running for reelection – and Hillary Clinton, of masterminding a massive coverup… for what, exactly, they never specified. During the numerous investigations, Fox News and it’s echo chamber were obsessed with finding a smoking gun, evidence that Obama and Clinton allowed four Americans to die in Benghazi, and then deliberately covered it up. If there ever was an actual witch Hunt to ruin a sitting president, Benghazi was it.
If I had been in Maddow’s position, I would have pushed back and asked Huntsman why Fox News is still the number one watched, so called news network? Why it is still considered a credible source of news after years of pushing the discredited Benghazi hoax and the conspiracy theories surrounding it, despite the numerous Republican led investigations that failed to find a smoking gun to tie around Obama and Clinton’s necks? Fox News has continued to remain a credible source of news in the minds of it’s viewers. Did their viewers tune out by the thousands after being proven wrong over their Benghazi obsession? Certainly not. If anything, they became more popular. This is the serious ‘news’ channel that brought us such hard hitting news subjects like Birtherism, Muslim no go zones throughout Europe, death panels in Obama care, Tan Suite Gate, the War On Christmas, and of course, Benghazi. One would think that after years of so much fake news, they would admit to the con they’re running, but instead often feel the need to get on their lofty perches to lecture MSNBC, CNN, and other so called liberal news outlets about what constitutes objective and honest reporting.
By Huntsman’s own standards and that of the entire right wing echo chamber, they are a large part of the problem for distrust in the news media.
Dana Loesch is a fierce defender of the second amendment, and her stance on gun control, which she opposes.
As a former spokesperson for the NRA, Loesch is known for berating the mainstream media as dishonest, which is ironic, since she has a long history of engaging in dishonesty herself, usually at the expense of just about anyone who disagrees with her. In other words, when Dana speaks, irony dies a screaming death.
When she isn’t complaining about the dishonest legacy media that is allegedly trying to silence conservatives like herself, she’s complaining about being smeared, as she is often smearing others. Dana, like most conservatives of her ilk, are unable to take criticism, and melt like the little snowflakes they are. Last year, after the CNN town hall, she ran to Fox News to cry about how unfairly she was treated, and that she had nearly been lynched by a mob of violent, gun grabbing leftists. Security cameras showed her calmly walking out of the building.
A dishonest hack, who once recently claimed on Fox News that she is not partisan, released a video last year in which she attacked the mainstream media with this ironic gem:
“We’ve had enough of the lies, the sanctimony, the arrogance, the hatred, the pettiness, the fake news. We are done with your agenda to undermine the voters’ will, and individual liberty in America. So, to every lying member of the media… to those who stain honest reporting with partisanship, to those who bring bias and propaganda to CNN, The Washington Post and the New York Times. Your time is running out. The clock starts now.”
Dana Loesch lecturing anyone on dishonesty, sanctimony, and arrogance, is hilarious to say the least. Dana feels comfortable judging others from her lofty perch, berating the media for everything she is guilty of – dishonesty, bias, and fake news, without a hint of irony of her own partisan hackery. She blames the so called liberal media of undermining the will of voters and individual freedom, when in reality it has been the Republican party that has actually undermined the will of the American voters by refusing gun control legislation to be voted on, and purging thousands of eligible voters in many states because they’re afraid they can’t win an election fairly without cheating, and then claim it’s Democrats that engage in questionable tactics. She blames the media for distorting honest reporting with partisanship and propaganda. Has she ever watched herself on NRATV? Her program, Relentless, was nothing but partisan BS and propaganda.
Loesch not only has a problem with any media that doesn’t tow a strictly conservative bias, but she has a problem with diversity, believing it to be a Marxist plot or some such nonsense. Last year on her NRATV program, Relentless, she put white hoods on Thomas The Tank characters to supposedly mock the libs on their identity politics obsession, and then played the victim card when criticized. She also has a problem with Black Lives Matter, falsely labeling them a hate group, and blamed them and Obama for the deaths of police officers in 2016.
These days, one of Loesch’s favorite peeves is whining about how law abiding gun owners are unfairly smeared as terrorists, but it’s nothing more than a favorite talking point that gun nuts in right wing media, like Loesch, repeat whenever the NRA comes under criticism. Which she gladly repeated during a recent segment on Fox News’s favorite show for white nationalists, Tucker Carlson Tonight.
Loesch was among the many conservatives in the media that clutched their collective pearls over former Democratic candidate Beto O’Rourke’s announcement of a gun buy back program if he were elected president. O’Rourke has since dropped out of the race, but Loesch has continued her tour of the right wing echo chamber warning of the dangers and threats to the sacred second amendment posed by violent leftist mobs that will show up at their doors to confiscate their guns, and lynch them in the process.
They also clutched their pearls over the San Francisco board of supervisor’s alleged announcement of all five million NRA members as domestic terror threats, which has had great American Patriots like Dana Loesch clutching their pearls along with their guns.
Carlson started the segment by whining about the Democratic parties alleged gun confiscation rhetoric, and the NRA being unfairly being labeled a terrorist organization.
They’re saying this for a reason, ” he said. “They’re telling you the people who have a 12 gauge at home to defend themselves are terrorists. They are setting it up to do something to those people. No?”
No. None of the Democratic candidates has ever referred to law abiding gun owners as terrorists, and the city of San Francisco’s board of supervisor’s did not call them terrorists. Conservatives who make that claim, are being disingenuous. The board was referring to the executives who run the organization because of their extremist opposition to any gun control and their use of propaganda to increase membership and gun sales.
Loesch then defended Trump’s tweet that he was being unfairly lynched by the Democrats for no other reason because they hate him, and that “these same law makers have been calling innocent, law abiding Americans, referring to them as quote, ‘domestic security threats and terrorists,” when in reality they have not.
If Obama had been the one caught making a quid pro quo with a foreign power, attempting to dig up some dirt on a Republican opponent, conservatives would be losing their s**t. When they claimed that Obama had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, without any evidence, we were all expected to believe it, but now that the shoe is on Trump’s foot, there is absolutely no evidence that he did anything wrong, even though there have been hearings where witnesses have testified that he did.
“Yeah, that ‘lynching’ is just noise,” Carlson said. “But I think you’re absolutely right. So, just to be clear, they are calling Americans who committed no crime, who pose no threat, who merely want to exercise their constitutional right, a terrorist? But what do you do to terrorists?”
Loesch criticized Bernie Sanders for wanting to allow convicted felons to vote, that AOC wants to end Mass incarceration of ( non violent ) criminals, and that the commie socialist Democrats want to implement the Red Flag law as an incentive to take guns away from law abiding citizens while they’re simultaneously smearing them as terrorists.
Conservatives can cry and whine all they want about the radical left coming for their guns, but in the real world it’s never going to happen. The gun lobby – the NRA and other gun rights groups – is too powerful, and because of that influence Republicans have blocked gun reform every step of the way, despite public support for universal background checks at an all-time high, approximately 90% according to Politifact. Even a majority of NRA members ( about 70% ), again according to Politifact, support universal background checks. But Dana Loesch won’t admit that fact. She believes gun control is evil, and unconstitutional, which proves she is anything but patriotic. Last year, after the Thousand Oaks, CA shooting, she tweeted this little gem:
“What happened was horrific. Evil is real. So are CA gun laws:
Don’t expect hoards of leftist mobs to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens any time soon. It’s the wet dream of every gun nut like Dana Loesch and Tucker Carlson. If it were to happen, it would be in a world without the NRA, and the politicians they own. You can rest assured that Dana and Tucker will bravely fight the crazed hoards of gun grabbing leftists.
Did you know that diaper wearing conservatives, like the fine folks at Toilet Paper USA, have a monopoly on patriotism?
That’s right, and here are the top reasons why conservatives are so super patriotic, and progressives are so clueless.
Let’s take a look at those reasons.
1 ) The Unholy War On Christmas – Diaper wearing conservatives love America because they’re Christians, love God, believe in Santa, and the Easter Bunny.
Progressive are Godless, and don’t believe in Santa or the Easter Bunny. In fact, Christmas was banned. According to conservatives, when the scary black socialist weaseled his way into the White House, he signed an executive order forbidding stores to display Christmas decorations and play Christmas music. Conservatives were forbidden to say Merry Christmas, but the politically correct term, Happy Holidays. But now that Trump is president, conservatives can once again say Merry Christmas!
2 ) Guns – You can’t love America if you don’t love guns. Am I right? Diaper wearing conservatives believe every citizen constitutes a militia and has a divine, God given right to an arsenal of military type weapons that must never be regulated. They claim that guns are not the problem. Gun free zones, single fathers, single mothers, video games, black on black crime, gun control, lack of God in one’s life and lack of prayer in schools, and anything else, as long as it has nothing to do with guns. These are the real causes of Mass shootings. They believe that young progressives marching in the streets for gun reform are not patriotic, but brain dead dupes of George Soros, the world’s most sinister and evil puppet master, who has worked his entire life from childhood to old age to undermine democracy all over the world.
Progressives believe no citizen has a right to an arsenal of unregulated weaponry, nor do they believe that gun crimes have anything to do video games, lack of prayer in schools, etc., or that young progressives are pawns of Soros, or that the NRA are patriotic.
3 ) Immigration – diaper wearing conservatives believe that Mexicans, and Hispanics are criminals and rapists. President Trump said so. They believe Democrats allow them to waltz across the border unchecked so they can steal jobs, eat babies, and replace white people, who will vote for the Democrats for generations to come.
Progressives don’t believe all undocumented immigrants are criminals, rapists, or drug smugglers. They believe they should be treated with dignity, and don’t support a ridiculous wall to keep them all out.
4 ) Free Speech – Diaper wearing conservatives consider themselves true defenders of free speech. They believe everyone should be allowed to speak at colleges without liberal snowflakes melting. The flag is a sacred object that must never be criticized, just as Israel and President Trump must never be criticized.
Progressives believe universities should be places of free thought and ideas, not exclusively for conservatives who target liberal instructors for harassment by placing them on watch lists. They believe that so called flag hating little pansies like Colin Kaepernick have a right to silently protest police abuse of authority by kneeling during the national anthem , and criticizing Israel and President Trump is not anti-Semitic and/or unpatriotic.
5 ) Climate Change – Diaper loving conservatives believe there is no such thing as man made climate change. It’s nothing more than a hoax perpetrated by leftists like George Soros, who are pulling the strings of climate change activists – like Greta Thunberg – who are too mentally ill to know they are being duped.
Progressives know it’s not a hoax perpetrated by leftists like George Soros. They know that it’s very real, and the science is backed by scientists who study the climate who say it’s largely man made. The real conspiracy are those who are backed by the fossil fuel companies who say it’s a hoax.
6 ) Terrorism – Diaper wearing conservatives have warped ideas what terrorism is. They believe only Muslims, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter are terrorists.
Progressives know that white supremacists are terrorists. They know that white supremacists are more of a threat to our safety than undocumented immigrants, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter. According to the Anti Defamation League’s 2019 report, at least fifty people were killed by right wing extremists in the year 2018, more than left wing, or Islamic extremists. Antifa and Black Lives Matter, both of whom diaper conservatives claim are violent hate groups, have never killed anyone, unlike white identity extremists, and yet they keep pushing their “Violent Leftist Mob” bulls**t.
When Ilhan Omar told Mehdi Hasan in a 2018 interview, “I would say our country should be more fearful of white men across our nation, because they are actually causing most of the deaths. And so, if fear was the driving force of policies to make America safe, we should be profiling, monitoring, and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men,” diaper wearing conservatives collectively clutched their Pampers and Huggies, along with their precious pearls. . She was smeared as an anti white racist who was calling for the profiling of white people who are allegedly radicalized by racist hate groups. What she was really saying was that fear is not the driving force behind policies like the Muslim ban, but pure hatred for Muslims.
7 ) Race – Diaper wearing conservatives can’t be racist. Right? Many of them actually believe the two parties are still the same they were long before the Civil Rights Act, that the KKK is a leftist organization, and the Republicans are still the party of civil rights. If both were true, why are conservatives the only ones fightingtopreserveConfederatestatues? Lest we forget, it was conservatives, many of them who voted for Trump and enthusiastically support his racist policies, that marched side by side with the KKK, and other racist neo Nazis groups, in defense of a statue of Robert E. Lee, in Charlottesville, Virginia, and murdered a liberal counter protester.
They deflect any accusations of racism by repeating the same talking points: DemocratsarethepartyoftheKKK; Nazisaresocialists, and Hitler wasaleftist. Propaganda is good for something.
Diaper wearing conservatives believe progressives and Democrats see everything through race, while they are color blind. If that were true, why the obsession with black on black crime? Why the racist talking point that black people who vote Democrat, do so only to keep them complacent on the Democratic Plantation with free stuff? Why the obsession with proving the first black man wasn’t American enough to be president? Why the ridiculous claim that he was pushing for a race war during the events in Ferguson and Baltimore? Why the ridiculous claim that Black Lives Matter has promoted the execution of law enforcement?
Progressives support groups like Black Lives Matter, because black lives don’t actually matter to the system, and believe helping people to avoid poverty has nothing to do with bribing black people with free stuff to get them to vote Democrat.
8 ) The Green New Deal – Diaper wearing conservatives believe the GND is Marxist propaganda, that it will destroy the economy, ban cars, airplanes, hamburgers, cows and their farts, and would bankrupt the economy, instead of benefitting it, and Americans.
Trump campaigned on the slogan Make America Great Again, and yet Diaper wearing conservatives have stubbornly resisted making it better in every way possible, and they have the nerve to call themselves patriots. What they really are, are crybabies soiling their diapers, screaming “Venezuela!” every time a progressive says a scary word like Medicare for all.
This past September Jeanine Pirro appeared on CSPAN, and as you probably already know, it did not go well.
The Fox News host, and former circuit court judge, has a record of making controversial statements. Whether she believes the outrageous things she says, is anyone’s guess, but they certainly are good for ratings, and her fans have responded with making Justice With Judge Jeanine, one of the highest rated on the network.
In March of this year Pirro found herself in hot water after posing the following statement:
“Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran tells women to cover up so that they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the Constitution?”
It earned her a condemnation and a short suspension from the network, but a few weeks later she was back to her favorite shenanigans, attacking her favorite Demon rats, and kissing the president’s rear end.
If Justice With Judge Jeanine was any indication of her appearance on C-SPAN, then viewers certainly got their money’s worth. Not to be disappointed, viewers tuned into C-SPAN’s Washington Journal to see a visibly distraught Pirro in contrast to her usual arrogant self. One caller mocked her for her suspension, while another berated her for her anti – immigrant rhetoric, as well her alleged rhetoric which may have contributed to the shooting in El Paso, Texas over the summer:
“And I think this thing about Trump making America great again. Trump is making America hate again, and it’s this hatred of races. I hear it all the time when I see, talk to Republicans and they say, ‘I went down to Texas and there are all these Mexicans speaking Spanish.’ Well, I got news for you. Those weren’t Mexicans, those were Americans. That guy that went down to El Paso to shoot Mexicans, he shot a bunch of Americans. and I’m really tired of this anti immigrant, this anti- people with- Brown- skin rhetoric coming out of Fox News and people like you, and coming from our president. It’s demeaning, it’s beneath the office. It’s beneath you. You used to be a judge. You should know better. It’s time that that stopped.”
Pirro responded by losing her chill, insisting she was not bigoted:
“Look, you know what? I refuse to accept your recitation of the facts. You are dead wrong. The problem in this country is not the color of anyone, and don’t you dare accuse me of any kind of issue related to color.”
Through much of the hour, viewers saw a nervous Jeanine Pirro , constantly sipping water like Marco Rubio. However, when she was chewed out by the caller from Texas, Pirro’s smug and arrogant self returned with a vengeance.
According to witnesses, Pirro remained upset after the call had been completed. One particular witness, who asked to remain nameless, said she attempted to compliment Pirro on her Fox News show, and that was when the fireworks began.
“All I did was try to congratulate her on the success of her show, and her new book, and she went absolutely freaking nuts!” the witness told the Journal. “It’s not like I’m a big fan of hers. I’m not. I’ve seen the show a few times. I think she’s got a loose screw somewhere in that head of hers, which prevents her from seeing things like normal people do. Some people may think she’s smart, which anyone can argue is debatable. But I happen to know from personal experience, that she’s nuttier than a squirrel turd.
“It happened right after the call that got her so upset. The interview had just been completed, and Jeanine was just sitting there quietly by herself, so I had just brought her a cup of fresh water, and was about to compliment her on the new book. There was so much tension in the air that I thought I might try and lighten the mood by saying something nice.
“Congratulations on your -” I started to say as I handed her the cup. She looked up at me with a crazy look in her eyes. She seemed to be in some kind of trance, but her lips were moving as if she was trying to speak but couldn’t get the words out. Drool was forming at one corner of her mouth.
“She continued staring at me with that crazy expression, and then for a moment she shook violently, making loud chomping noises with her teeth, and all at once her expression changed from blank stare to that of a screaming banshee. I’d heard rumors that she had spent some time in a mental institution, and I wondered if her weird behavior might be related to some mental issue.
“All at once she shot up from her seat, smacking the cup of water from my hand, nearly giving me a heart attack.
” ‘I’ve had all I’m going to take, and I’m not taking anymore of this bulls**t!’ she screamed. ‘Nobody calls me a racist and gets away with it! Nobody accuses me of hating immigrants! Do you hear me?!
” ‘Excuse me? Are you speaking to me?!’ I asked her.
” ‘Yes, I’m speaking to you!’ she mocked me in a girly voice. Then she grabbed me by the hair and shook me as if I were a rag doll or something. ‘Do you hear me?!’ she screamed again. ‘I’m sick of you leftists playing the race card, and I’m putting a stop to it right now!’
“I screamed in pain, thinking, Jesus Christ, is this woman trying to killmeor what?
” ‘What are you talking about? I didn’t say anything to you! Let me go!’
“I attempted to dislodge her hold on my hair, but her grip was like a vise. ‘Shut your little pie hole, b***h! I’ll teach you to call me a racist!’
” ‘I didn’t call you a racist! You’re crazy!’
” ‘You want crazy!’ she screamed. ‘I’ll give you crazy!’
Still gripping my hair, she proceeded to lift me up like I was made of straw or something. and slammed me painfully onto the table. Immediately her hands went from my hair to my throat.
“From the moment I handed her the cup, to the moment she threw me onto the table, it all occurred in less than a minute and a half.
“Oh God, I thought, I am going to die! She is going to kill me. She’s crazier than a bed bug in June! I tried to dislodge her grip, but again it was like a vise. I could barely breath. Her face was like the face of a mad woman, someone possessed; her eyes were wild and bugged out, her teeth chomping, and saliva foamed at the corners of her mouth.
“I managed to get out a strangled yelp, and as I did so I turned my head and saw one of the camera operators behind his camera filming the whole encounter! I lifted a hand pleading for his help, and as I did so, I heard someone shout, ‘What the hell is going on here?!’ and someone grabbed her from behind and dragged her off me.
“It was Steve Scully, the host of Washington Journal. He struggled with her, trying to calm her down, but she wasn’t having it. She was like a woman possessed, or maybe she had been bitten by a rabid dog sometime before the interview, who knows? I just knew it was a relief to have her off me.
“She kicked and screamed at Steve, who was attempting to get the situation under control. One moment she was attempting to strangle me, and the next she had him on the table attempting to strangle him, screaming like a wild animal as her talons closed in on his throat.
” ‘Somebody call security!’ he shouted.
“Security arrived almost immediately. They were both young muscular types, but even they were no match for Jeanine. When they attempted to lay their hands on her, she managed to throw them on the table, one on top of the other, while the four of us, Steve, the cameramen, and myself, watched helplessly as she attempted to strangle the one on top.
“She threw the second guard on the table with enough force that the one underneath uttered a painful ooooohhfff knocking the wind out of him.
“It wasn’t long before the police arrived, maybe a few minutes, but it felt a lot longer because the poor guards just could not get her under control. The guard on top had to struggle with a crazy woman who had the strength of two men, attempting to strangle him with her claws because she was either possessed or rabid, while the poor guy underneath struggled to get both of them off him, and was having no luck whatsoever.
“It took three big cops to pull Jeanine off the two guards, and even they had to struggle to do so. Her hair was disheveled, and her face was streaked with sweat and make up. They had to put her in cuffs, kicking and screaming the whole time how unfair it was that leftists were always accusing her of being a racist.
“Two men in whites coats struggled to restrain her in a straight jacket, and gave her a dose of Thorazine. As they wheeled her out on a gurney, she cried out, ‘I’m sorry, ma! Please tell them I’m a good girl. I’ll behave myself. Really I will! Don’t let them say bad things about me!’
“I would have felt sorry for her had she not tried to kill me. I had dark bruises on my neck for weeks afterward. I wanted to sue her sorry a** for the pain, discomfort and the humiliation, not to mention the doctor bill, but I couldn’t afford an attorney.
“However, the company that owned C-SPAN, did attempt to sue her not only on my behalf but also on the behalf of the security guards she had assaulted. But Jeanine settled out of court, and it will be months before I see any compensation, if any.
“It’s clear that Jeanine is bat crap crazy, and has some sort of mental issue, which had obviously been set off by the last caller. Apparently, she was also not too bright. She had no idea that the entire incident had been filmed, her assault on me, the two guards, and the host, Steve Scully. The rumors I’d heard of her visits to the psych ward, turned out to be true. She was not only bat crap crazy, but too dumb to know just how bat crap crazy she is, and I’m not going to waste my time feeling sympathy for the crazy b***h.
After CNN aired it’s seven hour town hall on climate change, Mark Levin complained about it on his radio show.
“The looney left is at it again, ladies and gentlemen!” he said in the irritating, nasally voice that all six of his listening audience were familiar with.
“Frosty Freeze?! We should eliminate Frosty Freeze!? Why the hell would we do that?! Frosty Freeze is one of the companies that drove the great ice cream revolution! That gave us such great flavors and not so great flavors of ice cream, like Rocky Road, Chunking Monkey, Better Butter Nuts And Bolts, Rolly Polly Chocolate, Bizarro Bacon And Banana – one of my favorites – Funky Fried Chicken Chocolate And Vanilla, BlueberryBonkers And Bananas, LooneyLefty’s LemonMeringue – a favorite of the looney left – CaptainCrunch’sNuts – there’s a real treat for all you looney liberals out there – Virgin Vanilla Crème, Luscious Backdoor Crème Pies Of Fun, and Randy’s RaspberryRainbowSupreme – two favorites of the gays because they contain every color of the rainbow! Can you guess the flavors that aren’t so great?!
“They also gave us ice cream companies, some great and some not so great, like Blue Bunny, Braum’s, Haagen-Dasz, and Ben And Jerry’s – not so good, they’re Marxists, but they do make great ice cream!
“So, what’s this nonsense I hear from Democrats that we should go back to the Stone age just because they don’t like Frosty Freeze?! What is this, an episode of the Flintstone’s?!”
When he mentioned the Flintstone’s, the popular children’s cartoon theme began playing in the background.
“Very funny, Mr. Producer,” Levin said. “You’re almost as funny as they are.
“So, I ask you, ladies and gentlemen. What’s their obsession with banning ice cream and the companies that make it, for God sake?! We all love ice cream. We all live for ice cream. I scream, you scream, we all –
“What’s that, Mr. Producer?”
Mr. Producer: “I said, it’s fossil fuels. They were talking about fossil fuels, not Frosty Freeze.”
For a moment Levin’s face turned red. Then he screamed, “So what?! They’re still a bunch of morons! There, I said it!”
While in the middle of a segment on the Kentucky shooting outside a Kroger’s store last October, CNN’s Don Lemon said something that triggered the sensitive feelings of totally not racist right-wingers.
“I keep trying to point out to people not to demonize any one group or ethnicity, ” he told Chris Cuomo. “But we keep thinking the bigger terror threat is something else – some people who are marching toward the border like it’s imminent. The last time they did this, a couple hundred people and they, most of them, didn’t get into the country. Most of them tired out before they reached the border.
“ So, we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men radicalized to the right, and we have to do something about them. There is no travel ban – you know, they had the Muslim ban. There is no white guy ban. So, what do we do about that?”
Lemon was making a point when he said he tells people not to demonize ethnic groups – conservatives do it all the time – but of course, that went completely over the heads of his triggered critics. And all it took was one line from his entire comment – the biggest terror threat is white men radicalized to the right – for conservatives to lose their s**t.
Greg Jarrett of Fox News wrote:
“CNN’s Don Lemon has now removed all doubt that he is a racist, hypocrite and an idiot all rolled into one. Quite the accomplishment.”
Meanwhile, over at the Fox News channel there is still some doubt as to whether there is any racism going on. Apparently, no one there has ever referred to asylum seekers as criminals, or animals, even though they are coming here just to see how many of those high paying jobs they can steal, sell drugs to real s**t kicking Americans, spread diseases, and commit as many crimes as possible before they can be caught and sent back. God knows they can’t be coming here to get away from all that same s**t.
Fox pundit Brit Hume wrote:
“I could hardly believe he actually said it. But the video shows he actually did. Remarkable.“
I find it remarkable that not one Republican in media can admit to their own faults or prejudices. When a Democrat says or does something that’s racially insensitive, everyone on the left is held accountable, but when a Republican does it, they accuse leftists of being racist for calling it out. There is no accountability.
I suspect that most conservatives are probably mature enough to admit that Lemon was making some sense. There is no media hysteria over white domestic terrorism, like there is with other forms of terrorism. There is no white guy ban, there are no talks of deportation proceedings whenever a white supremacist shooter walks into a synagogue with an AR-15 screaming about HIAS bringing invaders into America to kill their people. But MAGA chumps are immature and have abandoned all reason and decency when it comes to immigration. Brown skinned people coming across the southern border are nothing more than criminals to them, who should be locked in cages like animals simply for wanting a better shot at life. The right-wing echo chamber has them firmly convinced that refugees and asylum seekers are an invading force that is a prelude to white genocide.
Mollie Hemingway of the Federalist:
“Uhhhhhh… CNN’s Don Lemon: Stop demonizing people. Also, white men are terrorists.”
Right-wing commentators in media have no problem holding all Muslims accountable when an Islamic shooter is involved. But applying the same standards to white domestic terrorists is somehow racist? Sorry, not buying that s**t.
Mark Levin, who, in the past called America’s first black president a racist and anti-Semite, tweeted:
“CNN’s Don Lemon, lunatic.”
Mark Levin calling anyone a lunatic is not only ironic, it’s a hoot given the fact that he spent the entire previous eight years screaming at Obama in his girly, petulant, nasally voice.
Ben Cohen of the Daily Banter wrote this of Levin in 2016: “Levin is a repulsive stereotype of Republican assholishness. His nasally high pitched whining about liberals and gays, passes for political commentary in America. There is no one the joyless Mark Levin hates more than president Obama, a man who represents everything Levin is not. Obama is charismatic, powerful, and charming, while Levin is physically repellent and as likeable as a fart in an elevator. No matter the situation, Levin always finds a way to turn whatever current event may have occurred into an opportunity to attack Obama and ‘leftists’ he believes are trying to destroy America.”
Fox News Christian zealot, Todd Starnes:
“CNN’s Don Lemon: ” The biggest terror thereat in this country is white men. Is that unadulterated racism or bigotry?”
Call it what you will. What’s racist is the constant race baiting that occurs at Fox News, repeating white supremacist rhetoric, and attacking refugees and asylum seekers as criminals, and being less than human.
Donald Trump Jr. had perhaps the dumbest tweet of them all:
Sadly, the real joke in this situation is junior, the real moron. He’s even dumber than his old man, if that’s even possible.
One doesn’t have to imagine if “white men” were replaced with any other demographic. Fox News and other right-wing media have been doing the same thing for years with their “scary brown and black people” narratives, and no one on the mainstream right sees the irony. I guarantee not one right-winger who lost their ever loving minds over this, even noticed the hypocrisy.
From the linked article:
“Fox News contributor Deroy Murdoch said the racism coming from the left and mainstream media has become “breathtaking,” pointing to Lemon’s comment as the latest example.
The claim of racism coming from the left, is bizarre to say the least. Anyone who has been paying attention to the news of late, would know that this is an absurd charge. One has only to watch right-wing media, Fox News in particular, to see the blatant racism, bigotry, and xenophobia on full display. And it is indeed breathtaking. The attacks on four elected progressive congresswomen, the bigotry and death threats they’ve had to put up with simply for daring to be critical of Israel, by an egomaniacal president, and his lap dogs and sycophants in Trump media who shamelessly defend and excuse his bigotry.
“Lemon’s latest spurt of acid is a most unusual plea for national unity. Painting with a roller rather than a broad brush, Lemon slams millions of his fellow Americans. He does not say they are wrong, mistaken, or misinformed. Rather, they are a terror threat.”
Yes, white men radicalized by white supremacist ideology, are indeed a terror threat. That’s simply a fact they refuse to allow to penetrate their overly thick skulls. Recent events have proven that to be the case. But conservatives like Murdoch are only interested in one thing. Advancing the right-wing narrative that only Muslims are terrorists, thereby painting millions of American Muslims with a broad brush when a lone Islamic shooter commits an act of violence. They’re never mentally ill lone wolves like their white counterparts.
“Even worse, Lemon advises, ‘We have to start doing something about them.’ I shudder at the thought of what Lemon has in mind.“
I have no idea what Lemon may have had in mind, if anything. But I do know what conservatives like Murdoch would have done if Lemon had been talking about the Islamic terror threat, or an undocumented immigrant who committed a crime. Instead of calling CNN fake news for once, they would have been creaming themselves in ecstacy, and calling for the round up of every Muslim American, and or immigrant. When it’s a white person, a right-winger radicalized by antisemitism, hatred of Muslims, or hatred of immigrants, circle the wagons and cry racism.
“Lemon has been widely condemned for different rhetoric on Monday’s episode of ‘CNN Tonight’. Lemon injected race into a discussion of topics including the antisemitic, Trump-hating gunman who killed eleven worshipers in a Pittsburgh synagogue last week, and the Trump supporter suspected of sending mail bombs to Democrats.”
So, correctly calling the antisemitic shooter in Pittsburgh, a right-winger, is injecting race? He did that when he decided to target Americans who are Jewish.
“The right-wing group killed a woman in Charlottesville. This guy is a right-winger who killed the people in the synagogue. The right-winger sent bombs to CNN and Democrats. I don’t see Democrats killing people.”
Apparently Steve Scalise, who had recently survived a shooting by a “deranged leftist,” reacted to the fact that no Democrat in recent history had killed anyone, by posting a watching eyes emoji while his spokesperson, Lauren Fine, condemned Lemon’s remark.
She latter told Fox News:
“Steve Scalise was nearly assassinated by a leftist who came to a baseball field with the specific intention of murdering several Republican members of Congress. While that reality may be inconvenient for the narrative that Don Lemon is trying to push, the fact remains that Democrats do in fact have an issue with political violence that cannot be ignored or swept under the rug.”
The reality that is inconvenient for people like Fine, is that the Republican party has a serious problem with political violence, and they have conveniently swept it under the rug. They tell their voting base that groups like Black Lives Matter, and Antifa are a threat to law and order; right-wing opinion commentators tell their viewers that refugees from Guatemala and Honduras are less than human and should be treated like invaders, instead of telling them the reasons why they come here. The truth is, only one party has continuously used dehumanizing and dangerous rhetoric against those they deem to be a threat to their way of life – in this case, Muslims, and immigrants – and their media cohorts have willingly aided and abetted them without consequence.
Murdoch ended his idiotic rant with:
“The American left, of which ‘objective journalist’ Lemon clearly is a leader, is good at only one thing – psychological projection. Rather than contend with their own flaws, they accuse others of bearing them. Lemon and his ilk accuse President Trump of being racist, which serves as an incredibly thin cover for their own racist divisive rhetoric. The only good news here is that the American people increasingly see past the Left’s psychological self delusion and recognize these people as what they are… increasingly violent bigots.”
Murdoch is clearly full of s**t. He knows he’s full of s**t, he just doesn’t care that he’s full of s**t. Claiming that the left are violent bigots, when you have mass shooting after mass shooting coming from the political right, who are spurred on by right-wing media vilification of dark skinned foreigners, clearly demonstrates the hilarity of such a claim.
According to him, it’s Democrats and leftists that are the real racists for accusing the president of being racist. In other words, calling someone a racist is just as bad or worse than actual racism. Fine, let’s go with that.
After the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, the Republican party embraced the southern strategy to appeal to racial resentment in white voters. That same strategy was embraced by many Republican voters during the 2018 primaries and midterms. White supremacist Russell Walker ran for the House Of Representatives in North Carolina; Arthur Jones, a Nazi ran, for Illinoi’s third Congressional district; pro confederate candidate, Corey Stewart won Virginia’s Republican primary; Paul Nielen ran for Wisconsin’s fifth district ; John Fitzgerald, ran for California’s eleventh Congressional district.
For years, Republicans have accused the Democrats of perpetrating massive voter fraud, while they themselves have actually engaged in voter suppression tactics by purging eligible voters , claiming it will somehow deter voter fraud, or some such bulls**t. Trump once complained that up to three million undocumented immigrants voted illegally in the last election without providing any evidence.
When Republicans slam the social safety net as racist, that it’s nothing more than a ploy to get the black vote to keep them complacent on the ‘Democratic Plantation, don’t you dare call them racist. Everyone knows it’s racist to help others in time of need, especially black people.
When Republicans claim that the first black president was illegitimate, that he was the least vetted of all the presidents, don’t you dare call them racist. They’re concerned patriots.
When Republicans call the black president a Marxist, and a secret, radical left-wing, socialist Muslim who hated his own country, even though he was a center right Democrat, whose foreign policy was no more radical than George Bush’s, don’t you dare call them racist.
When Republicans claim the black president hated police officers and started a war on them, don’t call them racist. The real racists are that black president who once had the audacity to criticize a white police officer, and black people who dare accuse law enforcement of systemic racism.
When unhinged psychopath, and NRA board member, SpongeTed Squishy Pants encourages well-known political figures he despises to suck on the barrels of his machine guns, and tells Alex Jones that Democrats need to be shot like rabid dogs, don’t you dare call him violent.
When unhinged gun fetishist Dana Loesch tells her viewers that mainstream journalists are the rat bastards of the earth that should be curbed stomped for being critical of Trump, don’t you dare accuse her of inciting violence.
When SpongeTed calls for the shooting of undocumented immigrants, don’t you dare call him violent, or racist. SpongeTed is a great American patriot.
When a smirking, egomaniacal Dana Loesch calls for armed insurrection against Trump critics, don’t you dare accuse her of calling for violence.
When Republicans racially attack elected Congresswomen of color who have dared to be critical of their own government and that of Israel’s government, accusing them of hating their own country, and accusing them of being sympathetic to terrorists, don’t you dare call them Islamaphobic. It’s really ( wink, wink ) all about their policies and nothing to do with the fact that two are Muslim, and one a Latino.
When black people dare complain about systemic racism, and organize to fight against it, they’re called thugs, terrorists, and accused of calling for the deaths of police officers, but don’t you dare call Republicans racist.
When refugees who cross the southern border, or seek asylum at points of entry, are called invaders, murderers, pawns of the Democratic party who want to use them to replace the white demographic, don’t you dare call Republicans racist.
When white domestic shooters, radicalized by the vilification of Muslims, Jews , and undocumented immigrants on right-wing media and social media, shoot up a Mosque, or a synagogue, or target Hispanic and Latino Americans as an invading force that must be eradicated, there is no consequence for right wing media. Don’t you dare call them racist.
When the president of the United States asks his followers how to deal with Hispanic invaders, and someone shouts out shoot them, don’t you dare call them racist.
When the president refers to Nazis who were responsible for the death of a peaceful protester, as fine people, don’t call him a racist.
When a smug Dana Loesch puts Klan hoods on the heads of Thomas The Tank characters to complain about diversity, don’t you dare call her racist.
When Republicans predictably repeat the same talking point, “What about black on black crime?” after every mass shooting, don’t you dare call them racist.
When Fox News pundits tell their viewers that Black Lives Matter are a terrorist group that advocates for the death of police officers, and are more of a threat than white supremacist terrorists that have actually killed, don’t you dare call them racist.
It’s just so unfair to judge them all, to paint them all with a broad brush, even though they wouldn’t hesitate to do the same with a Muslim, a brown skinned immigrant, a black person, a Democrat, or a liberal.
I could paint them all with a broad brush, but I know not all Republicans are racist or bigoted. So, instead, I will call them what they really are. Insensitive, judgmental a**holes, that are not fooling anyone but their gullible viewers with their “racist, violentLeft” bulls**t narrative.
Since the latest mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, right-wing media commentators have been falling over themselves to deflect any responsibility for the tragedies, away from the president.
On Sunday night’s Media Buzz, host Howard Kurtz decried the media’s reaction to the shootings, saying that it was unfair to place the blame on president Trump.
“We just heard Beto O’Rourke saying on CNN that president Trump actually encouraged this sort of thing, with what he said after Charlottesville. And I knewthis was coming. It’s the pattern after every shooting. Often it’s about gun control.
“I understand that the president’s actions and verbiage are going to be a part of this debate – but to suggest that he’s responsible, that he’s encouraging, that he’s condoning the actions of a crazed gunman, seems to me to be horribly unfair on the media’s part. Politicians can do it, they’re running for office. But should the media tolerate this?”
Has the media gone a little over the top in their accusations that Trump is to blame? Yes, and no. Yes, he shares a responsibility through the divisive language he has used, especially in regard to immigration. Is he directly responsible? Certainly not. He didn’t pick up a gun himself and pull the trigger. But his language when speaking of illegal immigrants, referring to them as criminals, and rapists, and referring to them as an invading horde that must be stopped, certainly play a partial role.
Conservative panelist Katherine Timpf claims to disagree with the language used by the president regarding immigration, but also believes it’s unfair of the media to blame him.
“Unfair is the word that I would use here,” she said, “and I say this as someone who has had problems with some of the things Trump has said about immigration in the past. I certainly do not agree with Trump on immigration.”
At a recent rally Trump asked, “How do you stop these people?” To which, someone in the audience shouted, “You shoot them!” “Only in the pan handle can you get away with that!” Trump replied.
Do conservatives like Timpf and Kurtz – whom are both considered to be intelligent – actually believe that some unhinged person was not going to hear that and not act on it? Apparently so. Conservatives who support Trump don’t seem to understand this, and obviously don’t care to.
Timpf continued: “However, I’ve seen a few columns. There’s one in the Intercept basically saying the same thing Beto is saying, that Trump is responsible for this, and that’s just insane. Obviously Trump doesn’t want to see all these people murdered. Nobody wants to see something like this. They’re crazed lunatics. And if this manifesto does turn out to be from this shooter then yes, I would definitely call it domestic terrorism, and white supremacist, anti- immigrant terrorism… but to blame president Trump, that’s just – illogical, in addition to being unfair.”
Kurtz brought up the ridiculous notion that the same level of blame could be assigned to Barack Obama concerning his rhetoric against law enforcement officers after their deaths, which he added would be wrong.
“The president has already issued a statement callingthis a hateful act, and a cowardly act. At the same time I feel a sense of deja vu. During the Obama administration sometimes when police officers were killed, certain conservative commentators would go on air and say ‘Obama has blood on his hands because of his anti-law enforcement policies. Well, he did not and president Trump did not.
“It’s fair to challenge his rhetoric and handling of the immigration Issue. But to suggest that he would in any way be condoning the shooting of so many innocent people is something the media needs to be really careful about.”
Whether Kurtz is aware of it or not, he’s wrong. The same level of responsibility could not be assigned to Obama. Obama had no anti-law enforcement policies. He never engaged in anti-police rhetoric; he never stated that he hated the police, or even spoke negatively of law enforcement, despite what conservatives claimed.
He never engaged in divisive language when criticizing his political opponents. He never told his Republican counterparts – especially those of color – to go back to Africa. He never publicly referred to Republican run cities as ‘rat-infested,’ or crime ridden. He never accused Republicans who criticized his policies of being un-American. He never accused his political opponents of having sympathies to terrorist organizations.
Ironically, it was Obama who Republicans told to go back to Africa, who they accused of being un-American, of having terrorist sympathies.
Timpf brought up the media’s double standard concerning the Steve Scalise shooting.
“Remember the shooting at the congressional baseball game? That guy was a Bernie supporter and nobody brought that up.”
Whether Timpf was aware of it or not, she was also wrong. It was mentioned in the media.They just never assigned blame to Bernie Sanders because he never engaged in violent rhetoric leading up to the shooting. But there were many in right-wing media who very willing to tie him to Sanders. Several of them were Fox News commentators. Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Eric Bolling, not only blamed Bernie Sanders for inspiring Hodgkinson, but the entire left.
Since the shootings occurred, the president and some of his supporters in media have been engaging in what about isms. “Whatabout the shootings under Obama?” They have been asking. Nobody blamed him.”
As I have previously mentioned, he was blamed not only for the rash of police deaths, but also for the rash of Islamic terror attacks at home and abroad, because he wouldn’t use the politically correct term when denouncing those attacks.
Where was the call for unity when police officers were shot and killed several years ago in Dallas, New York, and Louisiana? Was Laura Ingraham , or anyone else on Fox News – or right-wing media, for that matter – calling for both parties to come together in unity? I don’t recall any pleas for unity from conservatives when these types of events occurred when Obama was president. They were too busy playing the Obama blame game. It was always Obama’s fault, it was the fault of the Democrats, the fault of the liberals, the progressives, the liberal media, and Black Lives Matter.
Everyone and everything was to blame, but guns, and the fact that anyone in America, regardless of their mental health, can get easy access to an assault weapon.
Right-wing media was deep in their partisan bubble, repeating their laughable narrative that Obama was stoking a war on cops with “anti police sentiment” or “rhetoric,” that this alleged rhetoric was somehow partly responsible for “contributing to violence against police officers.” Glenn Beck, employed by Fox News in 2009 during the arrest of a black Harvard law professor, accused the former president of being a racist for his criticism of a white police officer in his decision to arrest Dr. Gates. That was when this long record of alleged anti- cop sentiment/rhetoric supposedly began. From that point on, the rush to blame Obama became the norm when there was a shooting during his tenure in the White House.
Of course, anyone who actually did any research into this narrative, knew it was nothing more than propaganda. All one had to do was read the transcripts of the comments and the speeches he made after each of these shooting events to realize it was a lie, a lie that was part of the right-wing agenda to smear him as unamerican. In each of these addresses, he had nothing but praise for law enforcement. But right-wing pundits frequently gave him the middle finger by pretending the opposite was true, and they were all too eager to get on Fox News and other right-wing news outlets, and make fools of themselves by repeating this bogus narrative over and over again , driving it home to their viewers, who in turn spread the bogus “Obama hates police” narrative all over social media.
“How sad that for Democrats the weekend shootings are not national tragedies to be addressed in unity, ” Ingraham said Monday. “But the final epilogue of a play they opened four years ago.
“Why are we picking through the words of evil lunatics trying to connect the dots and figure it all out? Whether Inspired on the right or the left, they’re nuts. Period. What the country needs now is healing and unity.”
When police officers were shot and killed in Dallas during a Black Lives Matter march, right-wing media, Fox hosts and contributors, were not too concerned about healing and unity. When two police officers in New York were ambushed and killed by a black shooter, they were not too concerned about whether he was mentally ill or not. In both cases they were certain Obama, and Black Lives Matter were to blame, and that they both had it in for law enforcement. They were “pickingthroughthewords” of a president who they claimed had a record of “anti-police sentiment.” They were calling for the heads of Barack Obama, Bill De Blasio, and Black Lives Matter. Rudy Giuliani was touring the right-wing echo chamber repeating his embarrassing, and completely bogus “Obama hates cops” narrative, for which all the fact-checkers ripped him a new pie hole.
“We’ve had four months of propaganda, starting with the president that everyone should hate the police, ” he said on Fox News.
Conservatives were not pleading for unity after these events. Nor did they care about facts. Their only concern was to politicize and assign blame, and the Barack Obama was always the chief source of that blame.
Lisa Boothe of the Washington Examiner tweeted:
“Sick to my stomach to see news of the Dallas police shooting. I wish @POTUS would seek to unite the country rather than further divide it.”
Is Lisa Boothe sick to her stomach too see that Trump is dividing the country with his anti-immigrant rhetoric? No, she’s not. Like most conservatives, she has no principles when it comes to truth and honesty, and is more than willing to place the blame at the feet of Obama and Democrats when someone is killed, but daddy Trump is not to be criticized.
John Nolte of Breitbart News tweeted:
“Racist terrorists in #Black Lives Matter knowthat Obama is winking at them.”
“Obama condemning what he inspired and stoked!”
“Time to hold Obama accountable. This Baton Rouge blood is on his hands for inviting racist cop haters to the WH.
Joe Walsh ( former congressman ):
“Cops are being killed in America because of the ugly lie by Obamaand BLM that cops are racist and gunning down black men. That’s a lie!”
“This is now war! Watch out Obama! Watch out BLM punks! Real America Is coming after you!”
At no time did Obama ever incite violence against these police officers, nor did he ever call them racist. Ironically, it was Joe Walsh and other conservatives on social media who were inciting violence against a sitting president.
Congressman Steve King:
“Dallas police shooting has roots in anti-white/cop events illuminated by Obama. Officer Crowley. There were others.”
After Obama came out with his statement criticizing a Cambridge, Mass police officer for arresting a black Harvard law professor on his own property, racists like Steve King lost their minds, and accused him of being prejudiced against white people, for which he was forced to hold a ridiculous “beer summit” to try and appease the snowflakes.
Keith Ablow, Former Fox News contributor and disgraced psychiatrist, on Fox News, accusing Obama of stoking racism, as he’s on a network where many of its commentators routinely stoke racial discord:
“Who takes a phone call from a president? Instead of saying, ‘I’m sorry, aren’t you the guy that started this? This is the president that inflamed racial discord in this country and put a target on the backs of American police officers.”
These comments highlight the willingness of conservatives to lie to advance the agenda of a party that portrayed a president as anything but unifying in times of tragedy.
Fox News has a host of so called journalists and commentators who routinely suck up to the president. Among them, Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, and Mark Levin. These three are the absolute worst when it comes to defending the president. Each of them perfectly define the term sycophant. Nothing the president does or says can embarrass them, or make them question his mental stability.
Sean Hannity has always been an embarrassing partisan suck up to all things Republican, as has Jeanine Pirro, who is also a friend of the president, and who’s nose has been permanently clued to his rear end since his campaign.
Mark Levin, however, started as a never-Trumper, but has since become just as much of an embarrassing Trump boot licker as Hannity and Pirro.
Last month, Levin appeared on Hannity to complain about the biased media’s unfair criticism of America’s greatest president, regarding his reaction to receiving foreign intelligence on a political opponent.
“Have you ever seen a dumber media in your life?” he asked Hannity. “I mean, truly a dumber media?”
As long as he’s asking, I’ll be happy to give him my answer. As crappy as corporate media is, I have seen a dumber media in my life. It’s Fox News and most of the so-called honest media on the right, especially the Trump state run media, owned and operated by Sinclair Broadcasting. When the black guy was in the White House, Fox News continued to run stories on Benghazi, and the so-called IRS scandals, neither of them real scandals , but made up controversies because they didn’t like Obama. Does Levin consider that dumb, even though the many investigative reports disproved their narrative? No, of course not. They ignored them. Levin is not interested in truth and honesty. He’s more interested in pushing his own agenda, that the FBI and the DOJ are engaged in treason for having dared investigate Trump, and anyone who went along with it, be they Democrats, liberals, or Republicans, are also traitors. This is the clown who claimed back in 2013 that the Muslim Brotherhood had infiltrated the White House. “The Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated our government! It’s called Barack Obama! He’s not a former member, he’s a sympathizer. There, I said it! Prove me wrong!” He always screams, there, I said it, after saying something stupid, , which is ironic, since he loves to go after other mainstream news outlets for being dishonest and ridiculous. Lately he’s been calling for an investigation into his totally fabricated claim that big, bad Obama had spied on poor Donnie Trump.
From there he went into a what about the Democrats spiel, and to smearing Bernie Sanders as a Marxist, saying that he stole his ideas from Joseph Stalin’s playbook, because Mark Levin wouldn’t be Mark Levin without calling people who’s policies he disagrees with, Marxists. That’s Mark Levin in a nutshell: instead of reasonably disagreeing with your opponent on policy, call them a Marxist. And that’s what makes him such a buffoon. He has a BA in political science, but refuses to debate his political opponents on policy, and always resorts to smearing them as either communists or Marxists.
When Obama was president, Levin, who is totally not racist, criticized him for everything he said and did. Some of his criticisms were racial. According to Media Matters Levin called former president Barack Obama a low-life racist for daring to use the N word in context after the Charleston church shooting by Dylan Roof.
After the Las Vegas massacre, he linked to a report by a fake news site, according to Media Matters, and then had to delete it. He also linked to a report on Christine Blasey Ford without realizing it was the wrong Dr. Ford Media Matters. He started the unsubstantiated rumor that the Obama administration ordered a tap on the Trump Tower phones, and had said that Medicare For All would cause the deaths of senior citizens Media Matters.
Levin said it’s the mainstream liberal media that is out of touch, which is ironic. “You operate in a bubble in Washington, and in New York. You have no comprehension of what is going on in the country.”
If anyone in the media is out of touch ( and there are plenty who are ), Mark Levin is a perfect example of someone who is out of touch, and has no comprehension of what is going on. As an example of how out of touch Levin and conservative media are: a majority of Americans support a number of social policies, including Medicare for all. But Levin and others in conservative media slam them as Marxist policies that will bring economic ruin to the nation, and that’s nonsense.
As bad as the media is, Levin, and those like him, are even worse. They live in their own bubble, where everyone ( liberals, progressives ) who disagree with their view of America, is a socialist out to bring it down, and are out of touch even more so than the media they constantly complain about.
He ended his ridiculous rant about how it’s not the United States that has been itching for war, but Iran! It wasn’t Iran that backed out of the Iran Deal.
“The Iranians are looking for war and what do we hear from the code pink left in the media? That it’s John Bolton’s fault! That it’s the president’s fault! You’re pathetic. You’re a joke!”
Propagandists like Mark Levin parrot everything the president and this administration says as fact.
The fact is, Republicans have been itching to start a war with Iran ever since the Obama administration conceived the Iran Deal.
“So now they’re against ICE! You know what ICE is? I’ll tell you what it is, in case all the liberal pukes out there who can’t wait to call in to tell me how smart they are. Well, they’re wrong! It doesn’t mean what they think it means. I’ll tell you what it means. It stands for Ice Cream Enthusiasts. That’s right, all you liberal morons! Spell it out: Ice… Cream… Enthusiasts. It’s all the people in America who love ice cream. That’s right, ice cream. The radical left aren’t satisfied with eliminating detention centers. Now they want to ban ice cream and those who enjoy it. Ice cream for God sake! Can you believe it? What’s wrong with these people, these radical socialists, these communist Democrats?! It’s the insanity of the radical left I tell you! That’s what it is. They’re insane. They hate everything that America stands for: freedom, apple pie, the flag, the national anthem, the right to trash that flag hating, Nike shoe wearing little pansy, Colin Kaepernick, and the liberal media. Will they ban all of those next? The answer is a big, fat yes! I knew this day was coming ladies and gentlemen.
“There are two things we can do with these radical leftist Democrats who want to ban ice cream. We can round them all up and ship them off to Cuba, where they’ll be very happy living in a socialist economy, or we can ship them off to Venezuela where they can riot in the streets till their hearts are content. Nobody is touching my ice cream, God damn it! Hear that all you liberal morons? Hear that, Colin Kaepernick? There’s another idiotic cause you can kneel for, depriving Americans of their ice cream, because apparently it’s now as racist as these detention centers. Venezuela! Venezuela! Venezuela! That’s right, I said it! Tell me I’m wrong!”
When told by his producer that the radical left was actually proposing eliminating ICE, Immigration And Customs Enforcement, Levin expressed relief and replied that he hadn’t eaten lunch yet, and that his mother had packed a pint of Chunky Monkey, his favorite.
“The depraved national media has done a great disservice to David Hogg and to the American people.”
On February 14, 2018, Nikolas Cruz walked into Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland Florida armed with a semi automatic rifle, killing seventeen and injuring many others.
In the after math of the massacre, the student survivors rallied to start a grass roots movement to petition for stricter gun laws – an assault weapons ban, a ban of high capacity magazines, and universal background checks – which included the formation of Never Again MSD, and the nation wide March For Our Lives rallies.
As a result, a number of states passed a number of minor gun control laws. Florida passed the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act.
The NRA and the pro gun media didn’t take kindly to traumatized teenagers who had survived a shooting in their school, saying enough is enough. Nor did they like the fact that these teenagers were intelligent enough to organize a protest movement virtually without help from adults. But what bothered them most of all – especially the NRA – was that these no nothing little brats didn’t kowtow to the absolute authority and greatness of the NRA. It absolutely stuck in their craw. Instead of bowing in subservience to the NRA like our cowardly politicians, our federal law makers ( the majority of them Republicans ) do on a daily basis, they gave the NRA the middle finger, because they understood they are corrupt, and bribe congress not to pass any gun control legislation.
It stuck in their craw that people were angry at the NRA, and rightly so, so they sent their mouth piece Dana Loesch to parrot their talking points and deflect blame for the tragedy onto sheriff Scott Israel, instead of looking at Americas lax gun laws. And after the town hall, Loesch appeared on Fox News to whine about how the town hall had been staged just to inflame emotions – despite the fact that emotions had already been inflamed by the shooting – to make her and the NRA look bad – she did a great job of that herself without help from anyone – and how she, the NRA, and law abiding gun owners were the real victims, a false talking point pro gun conservatives continuously trot out whenever the NRA receives any criticism for its extreme pro gun policies. Fox News, Breitbart, Newsmax, Right-Wing News, Redstate, Town Hall, World Net Daily, all heroically came to Loesch’s rescue, echoing her complaints about how unfairly she had been treated by the depraved, biased media. Give me a f**king break. Cry me a f**king river.
Which brings me to the linked article. He believes it was the depraved so called liberal media that was abusing David Hogg because they allowed him to speak untruths about the NRA and Dana Loesch, both of whom shall forever remain blameless:
“The NRA is blameless. The blame lies solely with the shooter and law enforcement, from the federal level to sheriff Scott Israel’s department, to protect the children. But the students who point that out ( Kashuv ) only get airtime on Fox News, while the other cable networks promote Hogg as he continues to say things that are just plain wrong.“
Like the fact that the NRA and our politicians share a responsibility in this tragedy? Yeah, that’s totally wrong. It’s really those god damned teenagers that want to confiscate everyone’s guns, and do away with the precious second amendment. That’s the problem they should have been focusing on, not the fact that seventeen people had just been murdered with a semi automatic.
Not only is the shooter to blame, but the local sheriff’s department, and the FBI. The only parties that are blameless, are the NRA, and our state and federal law makers. How convenient. The NRA buys politicians to do their bidding, which is to have a pro gun, anti gun control agenda, but they share no responsibility in this tragedy.
I’m surprised he didn’t find an excuse to blame Obama for the shooting, like they blamed him for every shooting when he was president.
Less than a week after the shooting, Florida law makers couldn’t bring themselves to a discussion of an assault weapons ban, much less pass one. Instead, they chose to condemn pornography as a public health hazard! That’s how f**ked up these a**holes and their priorities are, and it demonstrates their willingness to allow the NRA to lead them around by the genitals at the expense of the lives of others.
“News anchors do not correct him. They don’t challenge his untruths. The media has turned Hogg into a spectacle, parading his activist statements in prime time and giving him a platform to spread immature and unserious attacks against those who stand against gun control. The media is wielding his tongue as a sword and his suffering as a shield to advance its narrative and deflect criticism. In doing so, they are teaching him that his attacks are good and right and are encouraging him.”
Twenty children were slaughtered at Sandy Hook Elementary. Fifty eight at a concert in Las Vegas. Seventeen at Marjory Stoneman High School. If you’re someone who denies the reality of gun violence; if you’re someone who believes America has too many gun laws ( insanely weak laws by the way, that allow anyone to have a gun ); if you believe standing against gun control is a noble cause; if you’re someone who gets their f**king jollies off at smearing traumatized kids; if you’re more concerned about your feelings than those who were traumatized in a school shooting, then you’re part of problem, not the solution. You’re likely not interested in a solution. So, shut the fuck up, and sit the f**k down. Let the children speak, the children, in this case, who actually know what they’re talking about, have reasonable demands, most of them supported by a great majority of Americans, and are acting more mature than the Dana Loesch’s, SpongeTed Squishy Pants, and their gun loving groupies.
He’s upset that Hogg and the other student activists are speaking out about gun violence, and didn’t bend the knee to the almighty NRA; that gun control and those who advocate for it are bad people, while those who oppose it are noble heroes fighting a noble cause.
The great irony here is that he decries the alleged immaturity of Hogg’s criticisms as untruths. But he has nothing to say about the actual immaturity of the actual lies and attacks directed at them from conspiracy minded wack job conservatives, who were encouraged in their attacks from the likes of Alex Jones, The Gateway Pundit, World Net Daily, and from the mainstream right-wing media, like Fox News. How the students were co opted by left-wing socialists, funded by Soros, were gun grabbing Nazis, mushy brained and soulless, civil terrorists for criticizing the NRA, and wanting to murder law abiding gun owners , even as they themselves were threaten with death from unhinged gun extremists on social media.
To many pro gun nuts this kind of behavior is acceptable, is not depraved. Nor, it would seem, are death threats against kids who ask for gun control. In their minds, what is depraved, is wanting gun control, and criticizing the NRA, which, apparently is taboo.
Trump ordering secret service to remove Jim Acosta from press conference
President Trump has signed an executive order to arm the unborn!
In a press conference in the Rose Garden, the president told news reporters, “I have just signed an executive order that authorizes anyone involved in the decision to provide an abortion, to refuse according to their religious or personal beliefs that an abortion is wrong. It also gives arms and weapons manufacturers, Smith And Wesson, Lockheed, Winchester, and others, full authority to assist in the making of specialized weaponry for the purpose of arming the unborn.
“The presidential executive order grants Doctors, nurses, patient and family advisors, full authority to refuse in assisting or taking part in the act of providing an abortion based on religious or personal beliefs that life is sacred. It also grants the unborn full protective status as human beings, as it is outlined in the fourteenth amendment. And as protected citizens, they have the right to arm themselves and shoot the Democrats when they come to pull them from their mother’s wombs.
“Like many Americans, I believe that life begins at reception. Even before you have that first cigarette, there’s another person in the room and you better be careful not to talk about aborting little Timmy, or Sally, because you might hurt their feelings. We need to start treating the unborn like everyone else. That means they should have the right to defend themselves in the event that their precious little lives are threatened baby hungry Democrats who want to eat them for breakfast, instead of having a pop tart or a bowl of Fruity Pebbles or something, and what better way to do that than giving them Uzis and AK-47s? If they had Uzis and AK-47s, the baby hungry Democrats would not be able to eat them, and sell their baby body parts, because, let’s be honest here, what do you do when someone is invading your home, your private property?”
“You shoot them!” Someone shouted from the crowd, eliciting nervous laughter.
“That’s right, ” the president said. “You shoot them. And then you ask them why they broke into your house. If it’s a Mexican, chances are he’s an illegal immigrant, and most likely he would be there to rob you, rape you, kill you, and then steal your job. Chances are it’s all four. If it’s a homosexual, chances are he’s there to convert you, and if you refuse because you’re a conservative, he’ll probably call you a homophobe just because you don’t like gay marriage and want to get rid of it. If it’s a gun grabbing liberal, chances are he’s there to steal your guns like Obama did. If it’s a trans gender, chances are he’s there to use you’re bathroom , and if you tell him – or her, or whatever – no, he’ll call you a transphobe, or whatever made up word they’ve labeled people who don’t believe transsexuals are a thing, and then, for good measure, he’ll probably rob you and then use your bathroom.
“We have the right to protect our property and ourselves with a gun if we choose. When someone invades our privacy, when someone breaks into our home, we have the right to shoot them. It’s in the Bible, and it’s in the constitution. Well, I believe the unborn should have those same rights, because the womb is their home until they’re born, so they have a right to defend it from crazy Democrats who would rather eat babies for breakfast than have a bowl of Wheaties or something. These are deplorable people, the Democrats. They’ve been eating Coco Puffs their entire lives and now they want to eat babies. They were cuckoo for regular Coco Puffs. Now they’re cuckoo for Baby Flavored Coco Puffs.”
CNN correspondent Jim Acosta was the first to raise his hand. President Trump pointed at him reluctantly.
“Don’t get crazy on me, Jim, or I’ll have you tossed out on your can.”
There was scatter nervous laughter.
“Yes, sir. First of all, I’m at a complete loss for words. I believe I speak for most of us here when I say that. Everything you said makes absolutely no sense.”
“Well, it’s impossible to arm the unborn with weapons, ” Acosta said. “This sounds like something someone smoking a questionable substance would say. Or a crackpot who’s been listening to too much Alex Jones. Are you a crackpot, Mr. President?”
“No, I assure you I’m not a crackpot, nor have I been listening to Alex Jones.”
“But you’ve appeared on his show several times prior to becoming president, sir.”
“No, I haven’t. That’s fake news. Get him out of here. You’re fake news. CNN is fake news.”
Two secret service men escorted Acosta out the garden as the president continued:
“It is possible to arm the unborn, and we will arm them with specialized miniature guns just in case they need to protect themselves from baby hungry Democrats who want to eat them instead of having a bowl of Fruit Loops, or Coco Puffs, which they should be eating, instead of babies. We will provide them with Uzis, hand guns, AR-15s, machine guns, bullet proof vests, hand grenades, sub machine guns, rocket launchers, and yes, even nuclear weapons, and then baby hungry Democrats will think twice about having a bowl of Baby Coco Puffs for breakfast.”
The myth of the liberal media has been pushed by conservative media figures for decades with no evidence. Actually the media is dominated by right-wing conservative voices that push a conservative agenda. Even right-wing talk radio has for decades, dominated the air waves.
There are three types of media bias. Sensational, establishment, and neutrality bias. CNN and MSNBC engage in all three biases. Fox is pure right-wing establishment bias. CNN’s guilt is not that it’s liberal, but that it constantly engages in neutrality bias, taking both sides of news stories that are important to a vast majority of Americans. For instance, whenever they do a news story on Global warming ( which is rare ), or gun violence, instead of objectively reporting the issues, they always go out of their way to present both sides, facts be damned, as though opinions and personal feelings are just as important as facts. They’re not. If CNN were liberal, or progressive, it would objectively report the facts on Climate Change, gun violence, health care, the Green New Deal, or any issue that is important to progressives and liberals, instead of engaging in false equivalency. Their anchors supported the Iraq war, and praised Trump’s bombing of Syria just months after he took the White House, and have featured more negative coverage of Bernie Sanders in favor of the establishment favorite, Hilary Clinton. CNN gladly bends over backwards to allow conservatives to rat f**k them, because they’re terrified of being called liberal or progressive, and still right-wingers bitch and moan about how biased they are against conservatives. F**king hilarious!
Last year, the conservative media giant, Sinclaire Broadcast Group, owned by the Sinclair family, which in turn owns nearly two hundred local affiliated news stations across the country, required local news broadcasters to air the exact same scripted message about media bias and fake news :
I’m extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism that we produce. But I’m concerned about the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country. The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming, national media outlets are publishing the same fake stories without checking facts first. Unfortunately, some members of national media are using their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control ‘exactly what people think.’ This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. We understand that Truth is neither left nor right. Our commitment to factual reporting is the foundation of our credibility, now more than ever.
The promo is nothing but pure right-wing projection, propaganda. Here you have a right-wing media broadcast empire – which apparently made a 2016 deal with the Trump campaign to do positive news coverage on Trump – requiring its local broadcasters to criticize the media as fake news, while they themselves are engaging in fake news and right-wing propaganda. Talk about media bias.
Right-wing media has done nothing but push fake news stories for years. Fox News did stories on birtherism, the belief that Obama’s birth certificate is fake, bashed him for wearing a tan suit, putting mustard on a hamburger, pushed conspiracy theories about how he deliberately allowed Americans to die in Benghazi, death panels in the ACA, the Seth Rich murder, Charlottesville was a left-wing Antifa conspiracy to delegitimize Trump.
So, the claim that the media is unfairly biased against conservatives, is ridiculous. However, there is plenty of evidence to show that there is a right-wing, and an establishment bias against progressives. But conservatives continue to push the myth of a liberal media.
Right – wingers are always whining about liberal intolerance. If you’re a liberal who believes that every human being deserves respect and dignity despite their race, religion, or sexual orientation, and refuse to buy into the right-wing myths and stereotypes about gays, trans genders, immigrants, and Muslims, then you’re the intolerant one. If you dare criticize their hateful and bigoted tirades and rants, then it’s you and all of liberalism that is intolerant and want to silence conservative thought and opinion. Which is nonsense.
Right-wing extremists like Dana Loesch, who accuse liberals of intolerance, engage in it themselves on a daily basis. An example of the intolerance that the right-wing has for opposing ideas, views and opinions, was their media assault on the teenage survivors of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Right-wing media ( including the NRA ) employed an extensive harassment and smear campaign to discredit and smear them because they had the balls to stand up to the NRA and the politicians they bribe, and say enough is enough, do something. They were accused of being crises actors; paid shills of George Soros, and leftist gun-grabbing Marxists groups; soulless and mushy brained ( that would be people like Loesch, and Squishy Pants Nugent ); they were civil terrorists; were compared to Nazis who wanted to ban guns; and wanted to murder law abiding gun owners. And not to mention, the countless death threats they’ve endured. This is actual intolerance. Conservatives, whose feelings are so fragile they are incapable of hearing an opposing point of view – in this case, teenagers calling for a strengthening of America’s lax gun laws – without completely losing it, and throwing temper tantrums like petulant children who can’t get their way. And they claim it’s really liberals who are the crybabies.
Gun reform activists are all fair game for right-wing criticism. When David Hogg said at the MFOL rally, “I’m going to put this price tag right here as a reminder how much money Marco Rubio took from the NRA for every students lives in Florida,” right-wing gun nuts, and the NRA, lost their minds. David French of the National Review, tweeted : “So, the adult activists think this kind of rhetoric is acceptable?” He had no such rebuke for fellow conservative Kevin Williamson when he called for the death penalty of women who have abortions. In fact, he wrote an article titled, The Sliming Of Kevin Williamson, praising him , and asking liberals to be tolerant. Conservatives want liberals to be tolerant, but apparently they don’t care to hold themselves to the same standard.
Likewise, he has had no rebuke for Dana Loesch’s violent rhetoric when she attacks the free press, and calls for the curb stomping of perceived liberal reporters and calls them the rat bastards of the earth, her NRA videos depicting liberal protesters as fascists for protesting, or some of her inflammatory CPAC speeches where she has used racially charged language to accuse the media of loving mass shootings. If anyone loves mass shootings, it’s certainly Dana Loesch, Wayne Lapew, and her other fascist cohorts at the NRA. Firearm sales rise after mass shootings, which pleases the manufacturers, which means more gun sales for the NRA, and more money in their pockets.
Conservatives like Loesch expect liberals to just shut up and accept anything they say about liberals and progressives, without criticism, no matter how insane it is. She and other conservatives can accuse liberals and Democrats of supporting infanticide. We must accept that insane accusation, and shut the f**k up, and if we dare criticize her, then we’re being intolerant. She proclaimed it, so it must be true, since she is just one of several harbingers of truth in a ‘dishonest liberal media’. And yet, if liberals or progressives dare accuse her, and the NRA of allowing children to be shot, for bribing politicians to ignore gun violence, and its failure to support universal background checks, then it’s a false attack against not only her and the NRA, but a vicious smear campaign to besmirch their flawless and wonderful reputations, and silence her and her fellow conservatives.
Let’s all cry a river for Dana and the honest media she represents. They’re such victims.
Speaking of which political party or movement that only cares about the constitution when it suites their purposes, it would be the Republican party and its conservative base, especially the radical, gun nut extremists like Dana Loesch who believe that the second amendment guarantees the American citizen the almighty God given right to own an arsenal of weapons ( it doesn’t ), let alone a single gun.
And how are liberals censoring conservative media outlets? Liberals have no interest in censoring conservatives. Conservative news sources like Fox News, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Wire, and conservatives like Loesch, and some of the biggest names in conservativism like Glenn Beck, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Steven Crowder – and anyone else claiming they’ve been censored from social media just because they’re conservative – are thriving on social media, like Facebook, and YouTube. The only so-called conservative outlets that I’m aware of that had been banned from certain social media platforms, were lunatics like Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Laura Loomer ( some of which have been reinstated ). And what does this have to do with big government liberal schemes? Absolutely nothing. It’s not a first amendment issue. Social media like Facebook and YouTube are private enterprises that have every right to ban content creators who violate policy guide lines involving hate speech. So, conservatives who claim they’ve been targeted solely for their conservative views, are just being disingenuous. Claiming censorship is a tool to work the sympathies of the gullible who buy their propaganda ( which includes all forms of bigotry ) as truth.
On the other hand, those who would not hesitate to censor their critics, are right wingers. For example, conservatives like Dana Loesch with her totally asinine NRA videos attacking liberals who protest the president’s behavior, and her attacks against journalists she deems to be liberal, whom she has called to be curb stomped because they dare criticize a Republican president. She constantly bemoans the legitimate media as lying, dishonest liberal hacks, while totally and conveniently overlooking the media she should be focusing her scorn and criticism on. But since she’s a member of that media, no amount of criticism will be forth coming, therefore exposing herself as a shameless, and hypocritical partisan hack.
It’s clear that Dana considers herself and her colleagues in right-wing media as troublesome truth-tellers to a supposed liberal media elite. Which is too hilarious to even consider. Loesch is a disingenuous hack who wouldn’t know what actual truth is if it rose up and bit her in the a**.
If there is anyone as dim witted as the president, it’s his oldest son, Don Jr.. Like father, like son.
In a story published last year in a CNN article, Donald Trump Jr. made the moronic claim that proved he is just as dumb, or dumber than his old man.
While at the premiere of Dinesh D’Souza’s Death Of A Nation, he told One America News Now that leftists were unfairly accusing the right of acting like fascists. “When you look at the actual history of how these things evolved – and you actually look at that platform versus the platform of the modern left – you say, ‘wait a minute, those two are heavily aligned, and frankly, contrary to the right.”
When Politfact ripped him a new pie hole for being a total moron, he claimed he was stating facts. Facts, that is according to Dinesh D’Souza’s version of history, which is anything that doesn’t fit the conservative, right wing narrative, is liberal bias.
From a Johnathan Chait article in The Intelligencer, on the same subject: “If today’s Democrats are the modern equivalent of the pro-slavery Democrats, why are they trying to take down confederate statues, while conservatives like Trump defend them?”
Here’s my question : And if Democrats are the real Nazis, why is it that the GOP had actual Nazis and white supremacists running for office during the primaries and the mid terms?
Also from Jonathan Chait in the same article : “Calling modern liberals the real Nazis and neo-Confederates, was a fun troll for the right-wing. You can’t troll your opponents as Nazis when there are actual Nazis marching for you.”
“Even though the GOP has employed the southern strategy, and had actual Nazis and white supremacists running for office in the primaries and mid terms, Democrats are the real racists and Nazis!”
After the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school in Parkland, FL., the NRA and right- wing media were desperate to defend the gun, which was unfairly being demonized by the left and its allies in the so-called liberal media, because as every gun nut knows, guns don’t kill people, gun nuts with guns kill people.
In Kyle Kashuv, a pro-Trump, pro-gun, pro-second amendment, anti-gun control right winger, the NRA and their unhinged supporters found their pawn, their hero, to parrot their pro-gun agenda, to deflect as much attention from the complicity of the NRA and federal law makers, and place the blame solely at the feet of local law enforcement, while they shamelessly attacked a group of teenagers who survived a school shooting, who didn’t share their enthusiasm for guns, calling them crises actors, idiots who had no idea what they were doing, pawns of George Soros and other gun grabbing leftists, Nazis, communists, and Marxists. They gleefully paraded him before their cameras, wrote breathless, gushing articles about how he bravely and boldly took on the anti-gun bullies on the left who couldn’t wait to call for a total gun ban, and smear the NRA and the politicians they really don’t bribe to support their pro gun agenda.
Kashuv exposed himself as a gun nut from the beginning. And since he’s been associated with the questionable TPUSA, he’s now been exposed as a bigot. I can’t say I’m surprised. And it’s also not surprising that conservatives would defend him.
Dana Loesch has compared Democrats and liberals who are pro choice, to baby killers, but conveniently plays the victim whenever someone points out her hypocrisy. Her stance, and that of her cronies in the NRA, is to oppose any and all gun reform, on the absurd notion that it’s a violation of the second amendment, and when someone rightly points out that by her own logic she is also a baby killer, she screams bloody murder, and attacks the victims of shootings as demagogues and gun grabbers, thereby proving just how pathetic a human being she really is.
“You commie libtards lynched me once, but never again!”
Did you know that any criticism of Dana Loesch is a vicious smear campaign? Anyone who criticizes or disagrees with whatever s**t that pours from her pie hole, is a smear campaign to silence little Ms. Wonderful? So, listen up all of you violent, anti American liberals and leftists!
She is not to be criticized.
She is not to be mocked.
If you do either, it’s a violent, vicious smear campaign, which proves that liberals and other leftists are a violent mob with one goal in mind : to silence conservative opinion!
When Dana released her awesome video portraying leftists as terrorists because they dare to protest Donald Trump’s policies, she had no idea that dishonest liberals would twist the meaning of her video, and insert their own interpretation. Because if it isn’t clear to everyone by now, then good damn it, it should be, that the wonderful, American patriots at the NRA, like little Ms. Wonderful herself, really are Freedoms Last Refuge, and you all better get that through your thick liberal skulls, and you better not say mean things about her, which might hurt her feelings, thereby proving she’s totally not a snowflake, and the feelings of her supporters, thereby proving that they’re totally not snowflakes either.
“They use their media to assassinate real news,” she says in her video. “They use their schools to teach children that their president is the next Hitler. They use their movie stars and singers, comedy shows and award shows to repeat their narrative over and over again. And then they use their ex president to endorse the resistance. All to make them march, make them protest, make them scream racism, sexism, xenophobia, and homophobia, to smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, to bully and terrorize the law abiding. Until the only option left is for the police to do their job and stop the madness. And when that happens, they’ll see it as an excuse for their outrage. The only way to stop this, the only way we save our country and our freedom is to fight the violence of lies with the clinched fist of truth. I’m the NRA of America, and I’m Freedoms safest place.”
Have Dana and her friends in the media ever engaged in fake news? Have they ever been less than honest? Of course not. Why, accusing Dana, or anyone in conservative media for that matter, of being dishonest, is akin to calling Jesus Christ a liar. Everyone knows that NRA TV is one of the few lone beacons of truth and honesty in a media that is dominated by lying, disingenuous liberals that make up their own news. Like, how president Trump is bigoted and racist, how Black Lives Matter really isn’t about hating cops and white people, and how the NRA is like a terrorist organization that hold federal law makers financially hostage to make sure no gun reform legislation is passed.
Have Dana and her buddies at the NRA ever been critical of the former president? No way. We all no that never happened. They never referred to him as a Kenyan born, Nazi, Marxist, terrorist sympathizing, America hating Muslim, who was going to take all the guns away. And they certainly never, ever accused him of racism, because when America elected its first black president… well, that was proof that racism was officially a thing of the past.
Have conservatives ever used their celebrities to repeat their narratives? Hell no! Conservative celebrities never got involved in politics when Obama was in the White House. Just ask Uncle Ted, the Motor City Madman, the Next Rosa Parks, the White/Black Guitar Slayer From Detroit, SpongeTed Squishy Pants. He never said any of those racist, sexist, homophobic, and anti Semitic things that liberals accused him of, or that liberals and illegal immigrants should be shot like rabid dogs. And he never crapped his pants to avoid the draft.
Did Tea Party conservatives march in protest of the black president? Not to my knowledge. They loved his policies. They never carried such signs as Obama’s Plan : White Slavery; and The American Tax Payers Are The Jews For Obama’s Ovens. They never accused him of starting a war on cops, or accused him of being responsible for the deaths of several police officers.
According to conservatives like Dana Loesch, and her supporters, liberals who criticize and protest the policies of Donald Trump, are nothing more than terrorists. That is the definition of a smear. But apparently, being critical of her smearing liberals, is itself a smear.
Dana Loesch at CNN Town Hall, prior to getting beaten, body slammed, lynched, and burned at the stake by violent, gun grabbing leftists dressed as professional wrestlers.
When Dana Loesch found out that Anderson Cooper and CNN had received The prestigious Walter Cronkite award for excellence in journalism for its 2018 Town Hall on gun violence, she was so jealous that she recently appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight to complain how shameful it was that she hadn’t received her own award for having her ass handed to her by the Parkland students.
“Seriously, people, is this a joke?” the conservative pundit and NRA spokesperson, tweeted in reaction to the news.
“Honestly, I can’t believe that CNN was awarded the Walter Cronkite for excellence in political journalism when everyone there was so mean to me,” she told Carlson. “I was literally booed, shamed, spit on, hissed at, tarred and feathered, stoned, beaten to a bloody pulp, shot, stabbed, water boarded, drawn and quartered, gassed, fried to a crisp, boiled alive, staked, beheaded, torn to shreds, hanged, lynched, crucified, and finally, burned at the stake. Then they took my ashes, put them in jar, and pi**ed all over them. Does that sound like advancing the conversation to you, Tucker?”
Carlson : “It sounds like outright murder to me. It seems like the whole event was staged, and they were ready to murder you from the moment you walked through the door, rather than let you speak. So typical of the violent left.”
“I mean, seriously,” Loesch continued, “not only that, but there was a mob of people there who were dressed like professional wrestlers, carrying signs that said, ‘Kill The B***h Queen, and ‘Blame All Law Abiding Gun Owners For Mass Shootings! Confiscate Their Guns And Kill Them, Too!’ All of them carried nooses, too.
“When they noticed me eyeing them nervously, they all rushed the stage at once, screaming, ‘Burn the witch!’ and ‘Hang The B***h!’ Several people tried to stop them, but we’re unable to prevent them from getting up on stage. There were just too many of them, and they were determined to kill me. First they took turns body slamming me like professional wrestlers do, using their elbows to inflict unbearable pain and damage on me, and then they teamed up and kept pouncing and pouncing, and slamming and slamming, until I was literally a pancake. After they finished, they posed for pictures with each other with my flattened corpse on display between them, like fisherman posing with their catch. Most of the audience, including the Parkland students, were laughing and encouraging them to kill me, while only a few were actually horrified at how I was being treated.
“When they were finished with me,” she continued, “they took turns punishing the few that tried to stop them from manhandling me. They did the same things to them that they did to me. One of them was senator Marco Rubio. Earlier he had been asked by one of the students if he would continue to accept donations from the NRA. You could tell how angry they were when he told them no. They wanted to kill him on the spot, and take his guns. But I believe they were biding their time, probably waiting to kill me first, and then senator Rubio, probably hoping to make a spectacle and an example of both of us, which evidently they managed to accomplish. They finished me off, and those who tried to defend me, and then they went after Rubio, doing the exact same things to him that they did to me. And as I was leaving the building, an insane leftist charged me from behind, screaming she was going to kill me, and stuff my corpse in the barrel of my AR-15, but thank God someone was able stop this one.”
Carlson : “Unbelievable! Exactly when did all of this happen, Dana? As far as I know, CNN didn’t televise anyone getting body slammed, or flattened like a pancake, much less getting stoned, shot, or stabbed.”
“Well, of course not, Tucker. CNN was not about to show what their sham of a town hall was really all about, which was putting on a WWE style event, and pretending that it was all about guns and how dangerous they are, while humiliating me and law abiding gun owners, and trying to make us look like fools, but succeeding only in making themselves look like fools. All of this happened after the cameras were turned off, Tucker, because they didn’t want anyone to see how violent and unhinged the leftist, gun hating mobs are. If they had left the cameras rolling, everyone would have sided with the NRA, and would realize just how awesome guns really are.”
Carlson : “I totally agree. To put on a display of violence just days after a massacre, is despicable, and totally typical of the violent left.”
“That’s right, Tucker. But what bothers me more than anything else is, I should have won that award, not CNN. I showed up to prove how awesome guns are, and I believe that’s exactly what I did.”
Everyone knows liberals are nothing but crybabies, who take offense at the slightest micro aggression, while conservatives are just the opposite. Below are a number of examples where conservatives have read liberal opinions without getting angry, upset, crying, cursing, unfriending, reporting, or otherwise acting like big babies :
Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to silently protest police brutality against people of color. No conservative howled and screamed bloody murder, called him unpatriotic, burned his jersey, called him names, or accused him of disrespecting the flag, America, the sacred troops, or threatened to kill him.
A certain shoe company hired him as a spokesperson for their Just Do It campaign. Conservatives calmly and respectfully disagreed with the shoe company’s decision. No conservatives filmed themselves burning their Nikes and uploaded them to YouTube for all the world to see. Nor did a single conservative call for a boycott, or return their Nikes for a refund because their precious feelings were more hurt than their feet.
Keurig decided to pull ads from Hannity over his support of Roy Moore. Absolutely no conservatives in America, or the Fox News audience for that matter, filmed themselves smashing their coffee makers in fits of anger.
Anti LGBT bigot Kim Davis was jailed for contempt of court orders to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. Not one conservative cried about how she was being persecuted by the liberal media and the militant gays. No Republican politicians appeared on Fox News to whine about judicial tyranny. They were completely OK with it.
The Boy Scouts Of America announced they would allow females to join. Liberals either didn’t really care one way or another, or welcomed it. Conservatives had a slightly different opinion. Besides acting totally mature about it, the general consensus was that the Boy Scouts were waging a war against masculinity, and liberals were acting like snowflakes for allowing it to happen.
The popular coffee company, Starbucks, announced they would hire thousands of immigrants. Conservatives took to social media to not to complain, or call for a boycott, but simply to suggest that Starbucks hire veterans instead of filthy brown people.
Been And Jerry’s came out with a statement in support of Black Lives Matter. The Blue Lives, and All Lives Matter crowd, who are totally OK with black people speaking out about police brutality and racism, declared they would continue eating the popular chain’s ice cream, even though B & J pushed a narrative about racism in law enforcement – which conservatives know there totally is not, it’s nothing but a liberal lie – instead of admitting that they really hate white people and law enforcement.
To demonstrate their maturity when it comes to liberal ideas, conservatives such as members of TPUSA never actually wore diapers on college campuses to own the libs. Liberals misinterpreted the whole thing. It was meant to be a metaphorical display of how liberals are the real crybabies.
Ilhan Omar had the nerve to criticize AIPAC, the Jewish lobby’s influence on the U.S. government. Conservatives ( including the president ) in the media and online, reacted calmly by totally accepting her opinion, instead of smearing her as an anti Semite, and a terrorist, or send her death threats.
When Alexandria Ocasio Cortez proposed a new green energy resolution, conservatives didn’t scream socialism, get angry or cry that it was the end of the free world, or that she was going to ban cows, their farts, and outlaw hamburgers.
These are just a few examples where conservatives have demonstrated how wonderfully superior they are to liberals in every way, and never act like big babies, as liberals always do.